Comparison Overview

Amber Signs & Print

VS

Hyde Park Label

Amber Signs & Print

59 Gossoms End, Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire, HP4 1DF, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ambersigns.com/

Welcome To Amber Signs & Print of Hertfordshire Amber Signs and Print is a well established Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire based business. We have experienced, skilled designers, graphic artists and fitters to look after all aspects of your of your project, from initial conception to final completion to the very highest standards. We pride ourselves on providing the full package for all sizes of company, whether it be branding and advertising for larger companies or complete corporate identity for new and fledgeling businesses, including fascias, vehicle livery and stationary. We aim to provide our expertise at very competitive prices and our portfolio shows our significant and diverse customer base, and why people keep coming back... Please take a minute to browse our website, and feel free to contact us for a quote.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Hyde Park Label

4031 Guadalupe, Austin, TX, 78751, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hydeparklabel.com

Austin’s premier label printing company For more than 25 years, Hyde Park Label has been serving businesses in central Texas and throughout the country. Our friendly professionals in sales, graphic design, prepress and printing offer expert advice and the highest quality original graphic design to help you create the best possible label. From 1-color to 8-color labels, Hyde Park Label gives you the best quality, reduced cost and efficiency combined with the friendliest, most knowledgeable service in the industry. Guaranteed. Call us today at 1-800-290-8580.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amber-signs-print.jpeg
Amber Signs & Print
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hyde-park-label.jpeg
Hyde Park Label
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Amber Signs & Print
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hyde Park Label
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amber Signs & Print in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hyde Park Label in 2025.

Incident History — Amber Signs & Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amber Signs & Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hyde Park Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hyde Park Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amber-signs-print.jpeg
Amber Signs & Print
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hyde-park-label.jpeg
Hyde Park Label
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Amber Signs & Print company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hyde Park Label company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hyde Park Label company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Amber Signs & Print company.

In the current year, Hyde Park Label company and Amber Signs & Print company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hyde Park Label company nor Amber Signs & Print company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hyde Park Label company nor Amber Signs & Print company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hyde Park Label company nor Amber Signs & Print company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Amber Signs & Print company nor Hyde Park Label company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Amber Signs & Print nor Hyde Park Label holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Amber Signs & Print company nor Hyde Park Label company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hyde Park Label company employs more people globally than Amber Signs & Print company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Amber Signs & Print nor Hyde Park Label holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Amber Signs & Print nor Hyde Park Label holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Amber Signs & Print nor Hyde Park Label holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Amber Signs & Print nor Hyde Park Label holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Amber Signs & Print nor Hyde Park Label holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Amber Signs & Print nor Hyde Park Label holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References