Comparison Overview

Amazement Square

VS

Claremont Lewis Museum of Art

Amazement Square

27 9TH ST, Lynchburg, Virginia, 24504, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.amazementsquare.org

Amazement Square is Central Virginia's first multidisciplinary, hands-on children's museum! Climb, slide and discover as you make your way through four floors of exciting, interactive exhibits, activities and programs. Visitors of all ages, backgrounds and abilities can explore global and regional topics, the arts and humanities, science and health-related themes, as well as expand their creativity.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Claremont Lewis Museum of Art

200 W First St, Claremont, CA, 91711, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
http://clmoa.org

The Claremont Lewis Museum of Art, located in the historic Claremont Depot, is a jewel of a small art museum that celebrates the community’s rich artistic legacy and promotes the cultural vitality of the region. The Museum promotes the arts in Claremont and the region through its exhibitions and events and provides art education programs for Claremont schools. Centered by the Colleges, Claremont emerged as an important art community in the years following World War II under the leadership of Millard Sheets. Artists are integral to the cultural fabric of the City, having contributed to its unique identity and personality for more than 70 years. In the tradition of their predecessors, local artists continue to impact the quality of the social and built environments.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amazement-square.jpeg
Amazement Square
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/claremont-museum-of-art.jpeg
Claremont Lewis Museum of Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Amazement Square
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Claremont Lewis Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amazement Square in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Claremont Lewis Museum of Art in 2026.

Incident History — Amazement Square (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amazement Square cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Claremont Lewis Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Claremont Lewis Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amazement-square.jpeg
Amazement Square
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/claremont-museum-of-art.jpeg
Claremont Lewis Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Amazement Square company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Amazement Square company.

In the current year, Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company and Amazement Square company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company nor Amazement Square company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company nor Amazement Square company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company nor Amazement Square company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Amazement Square company nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Amazement Square nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Amazement Square company nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Amazement Square company employs more people globally than Claremont Lewis Museum of Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Amazement Square nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Amazement Square nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Amazement Square nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Amazement Square nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Amazement Square nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Amazement Square nor Claremont Lewis Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References