Comparison Overview

Amarillo Family Institute

VS

Peerstar of PA

Amarillo Family Institute

4211 Interstate 40 West, Amarillo, Texas, 79106, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Amarillo Family Institute is a Marriage and Family based counseling service out of Amarillo, Texas, United States. Offices are located at 4211 Interstate 40 West Suite 101. Founded in 1994 and serving the five state area, a team of 12 therapists who specialize in treatment of addictions, affairs, grief, trauma, abuse, family and/or adolescent issues, spiritual concerns, depression, anxiety, as well as marital, couple, and relationship counseling. Please go to our website to review bios on individual therapists. The treatment team offers a full spectrum of modalities for whole-person care as well as nationally known marital intensives at thehideawayexperience.com serving couples from around the world.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Peerstar of PA

None
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 700 and 749

At Peerstar, we believe in the power of lived experience — and the power of connection. Peerstar is a pioneering behavioral health organization specializing in peer support services. We support individuals living with mental health and recovery challenges by matching them with our staff who have walked a similar path — and come through stronger. The right support can change everything. Our staff provide real hope, practical guidance, and a kind of understanding that only comes from being rooted in personal experience. With a dedicated team across the Commonwealth - from Pittsburgh to Philly and everywhere in between - we meet people where they are — in person or virtually — and empower them to move toward wellness, independence, and lasting recovery. No one should have to walk the journey alone At Peerstar, we don’t just believe in recovery — we live it every day. Because when people support people, incredible things happen. Empowering recovery. Strengthening communities. One person at a time. —-————————————————————————————- Peerstar provides Peer Support services for Adults, Older Adults, Transitional age Adults, and those with a Forensic background. Peerstar is an approved provider in 35 counties within the Commonwealth of PA and is licensed as a Free Standing Peer Support Program.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 181
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amarillo-family-institute.jpeg
Amarillo Family Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peerstar-llc.jpeg
Peerstar of PA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Amarillo Family Institute
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Peerstar of PA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amarillo Family Institute in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Peerstar of PA in 2026.

Incident History — Amarillo Family Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amarillo Family Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Peerstar of PA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Peerstar of PA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amarillo-family-institute.jpeg
Amarillo Family Institute
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/peerstar-llc.jpeg
Peerstar of PA
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Amarillo Family Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Peerstar of PA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Peerstar of PA company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Amarillo Family Institute company has not reported any.

In the current year, Peerstar of PA company and Amarillo Family Institute company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Peerstar of PA company nor Amarillo Family Institute company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Peerstar of PA company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Amarillo Family Institute company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Peerstar of PA company nor Amarillo Family Institute company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Amarillo Family Institute company nor Peerstar of PA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Amarillo Family Institute nor Peerstar of PA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Amarillo Family Institute company nor Peerstar of PA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Peerstar of PA company employs more people globally than Amarillo Family Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Amarillo Family Institute nor Peerstar of PA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Amarillo Family Institute nor Peerstar of PA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Amarillo Family Institute nor Peerstar of PA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Amarillo Family Institute nor Peerstar of PA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Amarillo Family Institute nor Peerstar of PA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Amarillo Family Institute nor Peerstar of PA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N