Comparison Overview

Amadeus

VS

Diebold Nixdorf

Amadeus

C/Salvador de Madariaga 1, Madrid, 28027, ES
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 750 and 799

We make the experience of travel better for everyone, everywhere by inspiring innovation, partnerships and responsibility to people, places and planet. Our technology powers the travel and tourism industry. We inspire more connected ways of thinking, centered around the traveler. Our platform connects the travel and hospitality ecosystem. We are making travel a force for social and environmental good. We are passionate about travel. With a unique perspective, at the heart of our industry, we are redesigning the travel of tomorrow.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 23,419
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Diebold Nixdorf

350 Orchard Ave NE, North Canton, 44720, US
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 750 and 799

Diebold Nixdorf automates, digitizes and transforms the way people bank and shop. Its integrated solutions connect digital and physical channels conveniently, securely and efficiently for millions of consumers every day. As an innovation partner for nearly all of the world's top 100 financial institutions and a majority of the top 25 global retailers, Diebold Nixdorf delivers unparalleled services and technology that power the daily operations and consumer experience of financial institutions and retailers around the world.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 20,251
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amadeus.jpeg
Amadeus
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diebold.jpeg
Diebold Nixdorf
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Amadeus
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Diebold Nixdorf
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amadeus in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Diebold Nixdorf in 2026.

Incident History — Amadeus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amadeus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Diebold Nixdorf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Diebold Nixdorf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amadeus.jpeg
Amadeus
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diebold.jpeg
Diebold Nixdorf
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Hard Drive Encryption Bypass
Motivation: Financial Data Breach, Unauthorized Cash Withdrawals
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Amadeus company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Diebold Nixdorf company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Diebold Nixdorf company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Amadeus company.

In the current year, Diebold Nixdorf company and Amadeus company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Diebold Nixdorf company nor Amadeus company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Diebold Nixdorf company nor Amadeus company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Both Diebold Nixdorf company and Amadeus company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Diebold Nixdorf company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Amadeus company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Amadeus nor Diebold Nixdorf holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Amadeus company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Diebold Nixdorf company.

Amadeus company employs more people globally than Diebold Nixdorf company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Amadeus nor Diebold Nixdorf holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Amadeus nor Diebold Nixdorf holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Amadeus nor Diebold Nixdorf holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Amadeus nor Diebold Nixdorf holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Amadeus nor Diebold Nixdorf holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Amadeus nor Diebold Nixdorf holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N