Comparison Overview

a.m. design

VS

Bark Design

a.m. design

38430 Chester Rd., Avon, Ohio, US, 44011
Last Update: 2025-12-01

AM Design is an award-winning graphic and multimedia design firm. Our focus: creating memorable communications that delivers stellar results for our clients. From advertising and marketing to promotion and public relations, we can provide innovative design for a single piece or a complete campaign. Whether you’re a Fortune 200 company, a small business or a non-profit organization, our talented designers will partner with you to develop the ideal creative solution to fit your needs and your budget. Located in the Greater Cleveland area, AM Design serves a global clientele.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 40
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bark Design

3115 W Montrose Ave, Chicago, Illinois, 60618-1313, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Bark was founded on the belief that great design can embolden those who are expanding on the promise of our communities. Since 1997, we’ve been pushing the boundaries of design to produce unexpected and extraordinary work for remarkable organizations of all sizes, from start-ups to large corporations. We build brands through effective design, working together to unleash your confidence through image and voice. Our team at Bark works with you, from strategy through deployment, to discover solutions that distinguish your brand and deliver your message.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/am-design-group.jpeg
a.m. design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bark-design.jpeg
Bark Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
a.m. design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bark Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for a.m. design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bark Design in 2025.

Incident History — a.m. design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

a.m. design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bark Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bark Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/am-design-group.jpeg
a.m. design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bark-design.jpeg
Bark Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

a.m. design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bark Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bark Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to a.m. design company.

In the current year, Bark Design company and a.m. design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bark Design company nor a.m. design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bark Design company nor a.m. design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bark Design company nor a.m. design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither a.m. design company nor Bark Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither a.m. design nor Bark Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither a.m. design company nor Bark Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

a.m. design company employs more people globally than Bark Design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither a.m. design nor Bark Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither a.m. design nor Bark Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither a.m. design nor Bark Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither a.m. design nor Bark Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither a.m. design nor Bark Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither a.m. design nor Bark Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X