Comparison Overview

Aluma-Form

VS

EDP

Aluma-Form

3625 Old Getwell Rd, Memphis, Tennessee, 38118, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799

Aluma-Form is a rapidly growing manufacturer of innovative, custom-engineered overhead utility and communications solutions. We offer industry-leading fiberglass, aluminum, and apitong wood products for the electric utility and communications industries.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 148
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

EDP

Av. 24 de Julho, nº12, Lisboa, PT, 1249 - 300
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799

Our story began more than 40 years ago. Today we are a global company, among the largest players in the energy sector in Europe and the 4th largest producer of wind energy. We are proud to be a leading utility integrated in the Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes (World). We want to build a new energy by promoting renewable sources. To do this, we have chosen ... ... to be 100% green by 2030; ... to be Net Zero by 2040; ... to innovate, to shape the energy sector; ... empower our communities to live more sustainably. Ours is the energy that strives to create a better future, inspired by people from four regional hubs. It is the energy that knows no borders, that never sleeps, and that connects us to you. We will harness wind, sun and water to lead the energy transition. We will all be green. We choose the Earth. Welcome to the official EDP Group LinkedIn page.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 13,888
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aluma-form.jpeg
Aluma-Form
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edp.jpeg
EDP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aluma-Form
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EDP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aluma-Form in 2026.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EDP in 2026.

Incident History — Aluma-Form (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aluma-Form cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EDP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EDP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aluma-form.jpeg
Aluma-Form
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edp.jpeg
EDP
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2020
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2015
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware (DynoWiper)
Motivation: Destabilization, Cyber Warfare
Blog: Blog

FAQ

EDP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aluma-Form company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

EDP company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Aluma-Form company has not reported any.

In the current year, EDP company and Aluma-Form company have not reported any cyber incidents.

EDP company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Aluma-Form company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither EDP company nor Aluma-Form company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

EDP company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Aluma-Form company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Aluma-Form company nor EDP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aluma-Form nor EDP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

EDP company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Aluma-Form company.

EDP company employs more people globally than Aluma-Form company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Aluma-Form nor EDP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aluma-Form nor EDP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aluma-Form nor EDP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aluma-Form nor EDP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aluma-Form nor EDP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aluma-Form nor EDP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.