Comparison Overview

Altman & Altman, LLP

VS

Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney

Altman & Altman, LLP

675 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Altman & Altman LLP is a Massachusetts Law Firm that has been representing clients throughout the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for the past 45 years. The firm concentrates its practice on Personal Injury cases, Criminal Defense, and Criminal Appeals. Our team has successfully litigated tens of millions of dollars in personal injury settlements and verdicts for our clients. At Altman & Altman LLP, the personalized attention along with exceptional results each client receives has been the foundation of our success. We pride ourselves in our attention to detail and creative solutions, to ensure we have pursued all avenues for a successful verdict. Personal Injury | Criminal Defense | General Practice

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney

221 W 5th St, Marysville, Ohio, US, 43040
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The mission of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney is to professionally, effectively, and efficiently provide legal representation and advice to governmental clients and within the bounds of law and ethics aggressively prosecute criminal offenders in order to protect the citizens of Union County and obtain justice for victims of crime. The prosecutor is an independent administrator of justice. The primary responsibility of a prosecutor is to seek justice, which can only be achieved by the representation and presentation of the truth. Our responsibility includes, but is not limited to, ensuring that the guilty are held accountable, that the innocent are protected from unwarranted harm, and that the rights of all participants, particularly victims of crime, are respected.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/altman-&-altman-llp.jpeg
Altman & Altman, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/office-of-the-union-county-prosecuting-attorney.jpeg
Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Altman & Altman, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Altman & Altman, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney in 2025.

Incident History — Altman & Altman, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Altman & Altman, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/altman-&-altman-llp.jpeg
Altman & Altman, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/office-of-the-union-county-prosecuting-attorney.jpeg
Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Altman & Altman, LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Altman & Altman, LLP company.

In the current year, Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney company and Altman & Altman, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney company nor Altman & Altman, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney company nor Altman & Altman, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney company nor Altman & Altman, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Altman & Altman, LLP company nor Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Altman & Altman, LLP nor Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Altman & Altman, LLP company nor Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Altman & Altman, LLP company employs more people globally than Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Altman & Altman, LLP nor Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Altman & Altman, LLP nor Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Altman & Altman, LLP nor Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Altman & Altman, LLP nor Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Altman & Altman, LLP nor Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Altman & Altman, LLP nor Office of the Union County Prosecuting Attorney holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X