Comparison Overview

Altero Design

VS

Myntra

Altero Design

Langebrogade 5 København K., 1411, DK
Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

Altero Design udvikler hjemmesider til Dansk erhvervsliv. Vi er endvidere leverandør af hosting, Content management systemer, online backup, søgemaskineoptimering - kort sagt er vi den eneste leverandør der behøves i forbindelse med online markedsføring.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1 employee
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Myntra

undefined, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560068, IN
Last Update: 2025-03-07 (UTC)
Between 800 and 849

At Myntra, we don’t just follow fashion - we define it. As India's leading fashion, lifestyle, and beauty destination, we bring together the best of style, technology, and innovation to create a seamless shopping experience for our customers. With a commitment to empowering self-expression, we curate over 10,000+ brands, blending global trends with India’s unique fashion pulse. Our people are at the heart of everything we do. We thrive on innovation and impact, where data-driven insights and cutting-edge technology shape the future of fashion. We encourage out-of-the-box thinking, collaboration with leaders and experts, and driving meaningful change. Myntraites have a passion for fashion - we take pride in being India's voice in fashion and in the brand we stand for. Our non-hierarchical, inclusive culture values ownership, meritocracy, and self-driven individuals who challenge the status quo and grow with every opportunity. We believe in empowering every Myntraite by providing the freedom to shape their career, fostering an environment where creativity thrives, and ensuring well-being and self-expression for all. If you thrive in a fast-paced, result-driven environment and share our passion for fashion, Myntra is the place for you. Explore opportunities: https://careers.myntra.com/ Be the trend. Be Myntra.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 17,016
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/altero-design.jpeg
Altero Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/myntra.jpeg
Myntra
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Altero Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Myntra
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Altero Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Myntra in 2025.

Incident History — Altero Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Altero Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Myntra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Myntra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/altero-design.jpeg
Altero Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/myntra.jpeg
Myntra
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Myntra company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Altero Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Myntra company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Altero Design company.

In the current year, Myntra company and Altero Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Myntra company nor Altero Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Myntra company nor Altero Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Myntra company nor Altero Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Altero Design company nor Myntra company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Altero Design nor Myntra holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Myntra company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Altero Design company.

Myntra company employs more people globally than Altero Design company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Altero Design nor Myntra holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Altero Design nor Myntra holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Altero Design nor Myntra holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Altero Design nor Myntra holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Altero Design nor Myntra holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Altero Design nor Myntra holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Deck Mate 1 executes firmware directly from an external EEPROM without verifying authenticity or integrity. An attacker with physical access can replace or reflash the EEPROM to run arbitrary code that persists across reboots. Because this design predates modern secure-boot or signed-update mechanisms, affected systems should be physically protected or retired from service. The vendor has not indicated that firmware updates are available for this legacy model.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Deck Mate 2 lacks a verified secure-boot chain and runtime integrity validation for its controller and display modules. Without cryptographic boot verification, an attacker with physical access can modify or replace the bootloader, kernel, or filesystem and gain persistent code execution on reboot. This weakness allows long-term firmware tampering that survives power cycles. The vendor indicates that more recent firmware updates strengthen update-chain integrity and disable physical update ports to mitigate related attack avenues.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Deck Mate 2's firmware update mechanism accepts packages without cryptographic signature verification, encrypts them with a single hard-coded AES key shared across devices, and uses a truncated HMAC for integrity validation. Attackers with access to the update interface - typically via the unit's USB update port - can craft or modify firmware packages to execute arbitrary code as root, allowing persistent compromise of the device's integrity and deck randomization process. Physical or on-premises access remains the most likely attack path, though network-exposed or telemetry-enabled deployments could theoretically allow remote exploitation if misconfigured. The vendor confirmed that firmware updates have been issued to correct these update-chain weaknesses and that USB update access has been disabled on affected units.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS bc-fips on All (API modules), Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. Bouncy Castle for Java LTS bcprov-lts8on on All (API modules) allows Excessive Allocation. This vulnerability is associated with program files core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeCFB.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeGCM.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/SHA256NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeEngine.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeCBC.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/fips/AESNativeCTR.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCFB.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeGCM.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeEngine.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCBC.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeGCMSIV.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCCM.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/engines/AESNativeCTR.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA256NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA224NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA3NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHAKENativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA512NativeDigest.Java, core/src/main/jdk1.9/org/bouncycastle/crypto/digests/SHA384NativeDigest.Java. This issue affects Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS: from 2.1.0 through 2.1.1; Bouncy Castle for Java LTS: from 2.73.0 through 2.73.7.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:P/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
Description

Wasmtime is a runtime for WebAssembly. In versions from 38.0.0 to before 38.0.3, the implementation of component-model related host-to-wasm trampolines in Wasmtime contained a bug where it's possible to carefully craft a component, which when called in a specific way, would crash the host with a segfault or assert failure. Wasmtime 38.0.3 has been released and is patched to fix this issue. There are no workarounds.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X