Comparison Overview

AltaReturn

VS

Databricks

AltaReturn

9350 South Dixie Hwy,, Miami, Florida, 33156, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

AltaReturn is now Allvue Systems. Follow us: https://www.linkedin.com/company/allvuesystems/

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Databricks

160 Spear Street, San Francisco, CA, 94105, US
Last Update: 2025-05-05 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Databricks is the Data and AI company. More than 10,000 organizations worldwide โ€” including Block, Comcast, Condรฉ Nast, Rivian, Shell and over 60% of the Fortune 500 โ€” rely on the Databricks Data Intelligence Platform to take control of their data and put it to work with AI. Databricks is headquartered in San Francisco, with offices around the globe, and was founded by the original creators of Lakehouse, Apache Sparkโ„ข, Delta Lake and MLflow. --- Databricks applicants Please apply through our official Careers page at databricks.com/company/careers. All official communication from Databricks will come from email addresses ending with @databricks.com or @goodtime.io (our meeting tool).

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 10,527
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/altareturn.jpeg
AltaReturn
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/databricks.jpeg
Databricks
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
AltaReturn
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Databricks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AltaReturn in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Databricks in 2025.

Incident History โ€” AltaReturn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AltaReturn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Databricks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Databricks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/altareturn.jpeg
AltaReturn
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/databricks.jpeg
Databricks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both AltaReturn company and Databricks company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Databricks company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AltaReturn company.

In the current year, Databricks company and AltaReturn company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Databricks company nor AltaReturn company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Databricks company nor AltaReturn company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Databricks company nor AltaReturn company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AltaReturn company nor Databricks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

AltaReturn company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Databricks company.

Databricks company employs more people globally than AltaReturn company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki Cargo extension allows SQL Injection.This issue affects MediaWiki Cargo extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki QuizGame extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki QuizGame extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki PollNY extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki PollNY extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki WebAuthn extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki WebAuthn extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:L/U:Amber
Description

pyquokka is a framework for making data lakes work for time series. In versions 0.3.1 and prior, the FlightServer class directly uses pickle.loads() to deserialize action bodies received from Flight clients without any sanitization or validation in the do_action() method. The vulnerable code is located in pyquokka/flight.py at line 283 where arbitrary data from Flight clients is directly passed to pickle.loads(). When FlightServer is configured to listen on 0.0.0.0, this allows attackers across the entire network to perform arbitrary remote code execution by sending malicious pickled payloads through the set_configs action. Additional vulnerability points exist in the cache_garbage_collect, do_put, and do_get functions where pickle.loads is used to deserialize untrusted remote data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H