Comparison Overview

AltaReturn

VS

Baidu, Inc.

AltaReturn

9350 South Dixie Hwy,, Miami, Florida, 33156, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

AltaReturn is now Allvue Systems. Follow us: https://www.linkedin.com/company/allvuesystems/

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Baidu, Inc.

Baidu Campus,, Beijing, undefined, 100085, CN
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Baidu is a leading AI company with strong Internet foundation, driven by our mission to โ€œmake the complicated world simpler through technologyโ€. Founded in 2000 as a search engine platform, we were an early adopter of artificial intelligence in 2010. Since then, we have established a full AI stack, from deep learning frameworks to models and applications, with industry-leading self-developed technology at every level. Over the past two decades, we have built a diversified portfolio of products and services, spanning an ecosystem of hundreds of millions of users, millions of developers, and hundreds of thousands of enterprises. We have now integrated our leading AI capabilities into our offerings, driving innovative use cases. Join us to shape the future of AI and technology. For media inquiries, contact us at [email protected]. For career opportunities, visit https://talent.baidu.com/static/index.html

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 25,945
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/altareturn.jpeg
AltaReturn
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baidu-inc.jpeg
Baidu, Inc.
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
AltaReturn
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Baidu, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AltaReturn in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baidu, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History โ€” AltaReturn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AltaReturn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Baidu, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baidu, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/altareturn.jpeg
AltaReturn
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baidu-inc.jpeg
Baidu, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both AltaReturn company and Baidu, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Baidu, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AltaReturn company.

In the current year, Baidu, Inc. company and AltaReturn company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Baidu, Inc. company nor AltaReturn company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Baidu, Inc. company nor AltaReturn company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Baidu, Inc. company nor AltaReturn company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AltaReturn company nor Baidu, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Both Baidu, Inc. company and AltaReturn company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Baidu, Inc. company employs more people globally than AltaReturn company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki Cargo extension allows SQL Injection.This issue affects MediaWiki Cargo extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki QuizGame extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki QuizGame extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki PollNY extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki PollNY extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:N/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki WebAuthn extension allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MediaWiki WebAuthn extension: 1.39, 1.43, 1.44.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:N/R:U/V:C/RE:L/U:Amber
Description

pyquokka is a framework for making data lakes work for time series. In versions 0.3.1 and prior, the FlightServer class directly uses pickle.loads() to deserialize action bodies received from Flight clients without any sanitization or validation in the do_action() method. The vulnerable code is located in pyquokka/flight.py at line 283 where arbitrary data from Flight clients is directly passed to pickle.loads(). When FlightServer is configured to listen on 0.0.0.0, this allows attackers across the entire network to perform arbitrary remote code execution by sending malicious pickled payloads through the set_configs action. Additional vulnerability points exist in the cache_garbage_collect, do_put, and do_get functions where pickle.loads is used to deserialize untrusted remote data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H