Comparison Overview

Altalaw LLP

VS

Grossman Law Offices P.C.

Altalaw LLP

5233 49 Ave, Red Deer, Alberta T4N 6G5, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Altalaw LLP is a respected, full service law firm established in Red Deer in 1976. We are a leading law firm in Central Alberta and cater to a wide variety of corporate and individual clientele. Our firm prides itself on providing the type of quality and service expected only in major metropolitan areas.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Grossman Law Offices P.C.

3890 West Northwest Highway, Dallas, Texas, 75220, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Established by personal injury attorney Michael Grossman in 1990, Grossman Law Offices, P.C. was founded on the belief that accident victims should have someone to turn to in their time of need. Over 30 years later, we are still working tirelessly to help personal injury victims, and the families of wrongful death victims get all that they are entitled to.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/altalaw-llp.jpeg
Altalaw LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grossman-law-offices-p-c-.jpeg
Grossman Law Offices P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Altalaw LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grossman Law Offices P.C.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Altalaw LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grossman Law Offices P.C. in 2025.

Incident History — Altalaw LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Altalaw LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grossman Law Offices P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grossman Law Offices P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/altalaw-llp.jpeg
Altalaw LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grossman-law-offices-p-c-.jpeg
Grossman Law Offices P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Altalaw LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Grossman Law Offices P.C. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Grossman Law Offices P.C. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Altalaw LLP company.

In the current year, Grossman Law Offices P.C. company and Altalaw LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grossman Law Offices P.C. company nor Altalaw LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Grossman Law Offices P.C. company nor Altalaw LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Grossman Law Offices P.C. company nor Altalaw LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Altalaw LLP company nor Grossman Law Offices P.C. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Altalaw LLP nor Grossman Law Offices P.C. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Altalaw LLP company nor Grossman Law Offices P.C. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Altalaw LLP company and Grossman Law Offices P.C. company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Altalaw LLP nor Grossman Law Offices P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Altalaw LLP nor Grossman Law Offices P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Altalaw LLP nor Grossman Law Offices P.C. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Altalaw LLP nor Grossman Law Offices P.C. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Altalaw LLP nor Grossman Law Offices P.C. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Altalaw LLP nor Grossman Law Offices P.C. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X