Comparison Overview

ALS United Mid-Atlantic

VS

WORKMED

ALS United Mid-Atlantic

1015 Virginia Dr, Fort Washington, Pennsylvania, 19034, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.alsmidatlantic.org

The Mission of ALS United Mid-Atlantic is to unite and empower the ALS community through a collaborative approach to fostering bold research initiatives, advancing national and state advocacy, and providing comprehensive care and support to individuals and families affected by ALS. ALS United Mid-Atlantic serves more than 1,200 people each year and covers a broad service area that encompasses eastern and central PA, southern and central NJ, and all of Delaware.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

WORKMED

Manuel Montt 427 , Santiago de Chile, Metropolitana, undefined, CL
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.workmed.cl

¡Somos líderes en salud y bienestar para tus colaboradores! Con más de 13 años de experiencia, nos especializamos en Seleccionar 🔍, examinar 🩺 y capacitar 📚a candidatos aptos para tu empresa. Nuestros programas de calidad de vida y bienestar laboral garantizan un ambiente óptimo para el desarrollo de tus colaboradores. 💼 Somos los más rápidos del mercado, entregando resultados en solo 8 horas. 👉🏻Ofrecemos agenda abierta, Análisis de NO aptos, presencia en 12 regiones a lo largo de Chile y mucho más. ¡Conócenos! 🚀

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 161
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/als-association-greater-philadelphia-chapter.jpeg
ALS United Mid-Atlantic
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workmed-ltda.jpeg
WORKMED
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ALS United Mid-Atlantic
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
WORKMED
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ALS United Mid-Atlantic in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WORKMED in 2025.

Incident History — ALS United Mid-Atlantic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ALS United Mid-Atlantic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — WORKMED (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WORKMED cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/als-association-greater-philadelphia-chapter.jpeg
ALS United Mid-Atlantic
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workmed-ltda.jpeg
WORKMED
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both ALS United Mid-Atlantic company and WORKMED company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, WORKMED company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ALS United Mid-Atlantic company.

In the current year, WORKMED company and ALS United Mid-Atlantic company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither WORKMED company nor ALS United Mid-Atlantic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither WORKMED company nor ALS United Mid-Atlantic company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither WORKMED company nor ALS United Mid-Atlantic company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ALS United Mid-Atlantic company nor WORKMED company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ALS United Mid-Atlantic nor WORKMED holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ALS United Mid-Atlantic company nor WORKMED company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

WORKMED company employs more people globally than ALS United Mid-Atlantic company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither ALS United Mid-Atlantic nor WORKMED holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ALS United Mid-Atlantic nor WORKMED holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ALS United Mid-Atlantic nor WORKMED holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ALS United Mid-Atlantic nor WORKMED holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ALS United Mid-Atlantic nor WORKMED holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ALS United Mid-Atlantic nor WORKMED holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References