Comparison Overview

Alpha Omega Clinic

VS

Foundation House

Alpha Omega Clinic

7007 Bradley Blvd, Bethesda, Maryland, 20817, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Our mission is to promote mental health and marriage & family flourishing through quality, affordable mental health services that are integrated with the fullness of the Catholic faith. We offer individual, couples and family psychotherapy, as well as psychological and psychoeducational assessments. Our clinicians are trained in the resolution of a broad range of psychological, emotional, social and educational problems, and remain faithful to the Magisterium of the Catholic Church. We seek to aid clients to overcome human barriers to living their faith, and thus offer a holistic perspective which works with their faith rather than against their faith. Our clients’ relationship with their parish and their spiritual life is an important component of working with them to promote their dignity and value as a whole person.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Foundation House

160 Preble St, Portland, Maine, 04101, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Foundation House has been a pioneer in the field of men's behavioral and mental health, substance abuse treatment, and our program continues to lead the way in quality of care. Combining evidence-based therapeutic practices, innovative programming, serene surroundings, and a nurturing environment, we offer an unmatched treatment journey. Our coordinated care transition bridges residential treatment to independent living. With an urban campus, and a 120-acre therapeutic ranch, our program provides truly unique resources blending urban and wilderness environments.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alpha-omega-clinic.jpeg
Alpha Omega Clinic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foundation-house.jpeg
Foundation House
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Alpha Omega Clinic
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Foundation House
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alpha Omega Clinic in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foundation House in 2026.

Incident History — Alpha Omega Clinic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alpha Omega Clinic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Foundation House (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foundation House cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alpha-omega-clinic.jpeg
Alpha Omega Clinic
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foundation-house.jpeg
Foundation House
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Alpha Omega Clinic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Foundation House company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Foundation House company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Alpha Omega Clinic company.

In the current year, Foundation House company and Alpha Omega Clinic company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Foundation House company nor Alpha Omega Clinic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Foundation House company nor Alpha Omega Clinic company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Foundation House company nor Alpha Omega Clinic company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Alpha Omega Clinic company nor Foundation House company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Alpha Omega Clinic nor Foundation House holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Alpha Omega Clinic company nor Foundation House company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Foundation House company employs more people globally than Alpha Omega Clinic company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Alpha Omega Clinic nor Foundation House holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Alpha Omega Clinic nor Foundation House holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Alpha Omega Clinic nor Foundation House holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Alpha Omega Clinic nor Foundation House holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Alpha Omega Clinic nor Foundation House holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Alpha Omega Clinic nor Foundation House holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.