Comparison Overview

Alpargatas S.A.

VS

Rodan + Fields

Alpargatas S.A.

Av. das Nações Unidas, 14.261, São Paulo, São Paulo, BR, 04794-000
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We are a global company, founded and based in Brazil for over 115 years. We are committed to delight the world with amazing brands, that convey lightness and joy to the everyday lives of our consumers. We own Havaianas brand, world leader in open shoes, known for the iconic flip-flops that represent Brazilianness, comfort and style. We have 49.2% of Rothy’s a north-american sustainable footwear Brand. The Havaianas brand is one of the largest open-toe footwear brands in the world, with a significant presence and operation in dozens of countries. Rothy’s is present in the United States. Our growth is based on sustainability and economy, always valuing the socio-environmental responsibility of our operations. Our supply chain is vertical, with four manufacturing units in Brazil, and we own ioasys, our digital transformation company. We are more than 10 thousand employees, passionate about make it happen, who want to inspire the world to walk a lighter path. #WeAreAlpaLovers – Inspired by consumers and we walk together to make it happen!

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 13,977
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rodan + Fields

60 Spear Street, San Francisco, CA, 94105, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22

We are Rodan + Fields, founded by Stanford-trained dermatologists with a mission to revolutionize skincare for women everywhere. Our products are dermatologist-developed and inspired by Women-Backed Science™, delivering real, visible results. We understand what works for women’s skin, from acne to the signs of aging, and are dedicated to providing safe, effective solutions that truly work. As the #1 Female Dermatologist-Founded Skincare Brand in the US*, we continue to innovate and grow. With over 12 million customers and more than 15 years of proven results, Rodan + Fields is committed to delivering the best for your skin. We value diversity and inclusivity and are always looking for passionate individuals who want to make a meaningful impact. If you’re driven by science and skincare, and want to help women achieve healthy, glowing skin, we’d love to have you with us. *For more details visit our website

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 19,733
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alpargatas.jpeg
Alpargatas S.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rodan-fields.jpeg
Rodan + Fields
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Alpargatas S.A.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rodan + Fields
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alpargatas S.A. in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rodan + Fields in 2025.

Incident History — Alpargatas S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alpargatas S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rodan + Fields (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rodan + Fields cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alpargatas.jpeg
Alpargatas S.A.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rodan-fields.jpeg
Rodan + Fields
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Alpargatas S.A. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rodan + Fields company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rodan + Fields company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Alpargatas S.A. company.

In the current year, Rodan + Fields company and Alpargatas S.A. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rodan + Fields company nor Alpargatas S.A. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rodan + Fields company nor Alpargatas S.A. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rodan + Fields company nor Alpargatas S.A. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Alpargatas S.A. company nor Rodan + Fields company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Alpargatas S.A. nor Rodan + Fields holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Alpargatas S.A. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Rodan + Fields company.

Rodan + Fields company employs more people globally than Alpargatas S.A. company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither Alpargatas S.A. nor Rodan + Fields holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Alpargatas S.A. nor Rodan + Fields holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Alpargatas S.A. nor Rodan + Fields holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Alpargatas S.A. nor Rodan + Fields holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Alpargatas S.A. nor Rodan + Fields holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Alpargatas S.A. nor Rodan + Fields holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H