Comparison Overview

AlmavivA Group

VS

Sogeti

AlmavivA Group

Via di Casal Boccone, 188-190, Roma, IT, 00137
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Almaviva is synonymous with digital innovation. Proven experience, unique skills, ongoing research and in-depth knowledge of a range of public and private market sectors are what make it the leading Italian Group in Information & Communications Technology. Almaviva leads the Country growth and takes up the challenge that companies must face to remain competitive in the Absolute Digital Age, by innovating their business model, organization, enterprise culture and ICT. With 41,000 people - 7,000 in Italy and 34,000 overseas - Almaviva is the 3rd private Italian Group in terms of people worldwide, with a turnover of € 1.411 million in 2024. Almaviva Group operates globally, with 44 offices in Italy and 35 abroad. It has a significant presence in Brazil, and is also operational in the United States, Colombia, Egypt, Finland, the Dominican Republic, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Tunisia, and Brussels, the nerve center of the EU. Since 2015 Almaviva is a partner of the world's largest corporate sustainability initiative, UN Global Compact.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 47,385
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sogeti

145-151 Quai du Président Roosevelt,, Paris, Paris - Issy-les-Moulineaux, 92130, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Part of the Capgemini Group, Sogeti makes business value through technology for organizations that need to implement innovation at speed and want a local partner with global scale. With a hands-on culture and close proximity to its clients, Sogeti implements solutions that will help organizations work faster, better, and smarter. By combining its agility and speed of implementation through a DevOps approach, Sogeti delivers innovative solutions in quality engineering, cloud and application development, all driven by AI, data and automation. For more information please visit www.sogeti.com.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 11,384
Subsidiaries: 37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/almaviva-group.jpeg
AlmavivA Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sogeti.jpeg
Sogeti
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AlmavivA Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sogeti
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AlmavivA Group in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sogeti in 2025.

Incident History — AlmavivA Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AlmavivA Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sogeti (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sogeti cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/almaviva-group.jpeg
AlmavivA Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sogeti.jpeg
Sogeti
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AlmavivA Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sogeti company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sogeti company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AlmavivA Group company.

In the current year, Sogeti company and AlmavivA Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sogeti company nor AlmavivA Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sogeti company nor AlmavivA Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sogeti company nor AlmavivA Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AlmavivA Group company nor Sogeti company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AlmavivA Group nor Sogeti holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Sogeti company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AlmavivA Group company.

AlmavivA Group company employs more people globally than Sogeti company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither AlmavivA Group nor Sogeti holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AlmavivA Group nor Sogeti holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AlmavivA Group nor Sogeti holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AlmavivA Group nor Sogeti holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AlmavivA Group nor Sogeti holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AlmavivA Group nor Sogeti holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H