Comparison Overview

Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP

VS

Central Minnesota Legal Services

Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP

undefined, Austin, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

“Our mission as a Firm is to provide quality legal representation for individuals and their related entities. We are committed to providing well considered and intelligent counseling for our clients. ” says partner Martha S. Dickie. As a result, the Firm was founded on the principle of offering not only superior legal representation for individuals, professionals and businesses at a fair price, but also real solutions to its clients’ toughest legal challenges. This vision is shared by each of its attorneys and is reflected in both its litigation and transactional practices. “Our approach has produced a strong and loyal client base, including local, regional and national clients,” says co-founder and partner Boone Almanza.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Central Minnesota Legal Services

111 North 5th St, Minneapolis, 55403, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Central Minnesota Legal Services provides civil legal services to low-income persons in 21 counties in Central Minnesota. Our mission is to increase access to justice by providing high quality legal services to individuals experiencing poverty, challenging inequities, and empowering community members to participate in our civil legal system. Clients receive legal services at no cost, unless there are court fees that cannot be waived. CMLS helps eligible clients through direct representation, brief advice, and through participating in community legal outreach.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/almanza-blackburn-&-dickie-llp.jpeg
Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Central Minnesota Legal Services
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Central Minnesota Legal Services in 2025.

Incident History — Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Central Minnesota Legal Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Central Minnesota Legal Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/almanza-blackburn-&-dickie-llp.jpeg
Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/central-minnesota-legal-services.jpeg
Central Minnesota Legal Services
Incidents

FAQ

Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Central Minnesota Legal Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Central Minnesota Legal Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP company.

In the current year, Central Minnesota Legal Services company and Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Central Minnesota Legal Services company nor Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Central Minnesota Legal Services company nor Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Central Minnesota Legal Services company nor Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP company nor Central Minnesota Legal Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP nor Central Minnesota Legal Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP company nor Central Minnesota Legal Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Central Minnesota Legal Services company employs more people globally than Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP nor Central Minnesota Legal Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP nor Central Minnesota Legal Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP nor Central Minnesota Legal Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP nor Central Minnesota Legal Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP nor Central Minnesota Legal Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Almanza, Blackburn, Dickie & Mitchell LLP nor Central Minnesota Legal Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X