Comparison Overview

AllowTech

VS

Microchip Technology Inc.

AllowTech

28720 Roadside Drive, Suite #176, Agoura Hills, California, 91301, US
Last Update: 2025-03-06 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

AllowTechโ€™s highly experienced engineers deliver leading-edge FPGA solutions to meet customer needs. With requirements ranging from low-cost to complex designs, Allowtech will accelerate your product development and boost your competitive advantage while reducing cost and risk. We work closely with leading FPGA vendors like Altera and Xilinx to deliver the latest technology available to our customers.

NAICS: 334
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Microchip Technology Inc.

undefined, Chandler, AZ, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Microchip Technology Inc. is a leading semiconductor supplier of smart, connected and secure embedded control solutions. Its easy-to-use development tools and comprehensive product portfolio enable customers to create optimal designs which reduce risk while lowering total system cost and time to market. The companyโ€™s solutions serve more than 125,000 customers across the industrial, automotive, consumer, aerospace and defense, communications and computing markets. Headquartered in Chandler, Arizona, Microchip offers outstanding technical support along with dependable delivery and quality. For more information, visit the Microchip website at www.microchip.com.

NAICS: 3344
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 17,487
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allowtech_2.jpeg
AllowTech
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/microchip-technology.jpeg
Microchip Technology Inc.
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
AllowTech
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Microchip Technology Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AllowTech in 2025.

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Microchip Technology Inc. has 222.58% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History โ€” AllowTech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AllowTech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Microchip Technology Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microchip Technology Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allowtech_2.jpeg
AllowTech
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/microchip-technology.jpeg
Microchip Technology Inc.
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Email, Telephone
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution, Email Phishing, Phone Calls
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both AllowTech company and Microchip Technology Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Microchip Technology Inc. company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas AllowTech company has not reported any.

In the current year, Microchip Technology Inc. company has reported more cyber incidents than AllowTech company.

Microchip Technology Inc. company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while AllowTech company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Microchip Technology Inc. company nor AllowTech company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Microchip Technology Inc. company nor AllowTech company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AllowTech company nor Microchip Technology Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Microchip Technology Inc. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AllowTech company.

Microchip Technology Inc. company employs more people globally than AllowTech company, reflecting its scale as a Semiconductor Manufacturing.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

TS3 Manager is modern web interface for maintaining Teamspeak3 servers. A reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability has been identified in versions 2.2.1 and earlier. The vulnerability exists in the error handling mechanism of the login page, where malicious scripts embedded in server hostnames are executed in the victim's browser context without proper sanitization. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

TS3 Manager is modern web interface for maintaining Teamspeak3 servers. A Denial of Dervice vulnerability has been identified in versions 2.2.1 and earlier. The vulnerability permits an unauthenticated actor to crash the application through the submission of specially crafted Unicode input, requiring no prior authentication or privileges. The flaw manifests when Unicode tag characters are submitted to the Server field on the login page. The application fails to properly handle these characters during the ASCII conversion process, resulting in an unhandled exception that terminates the application within four to five seconds of submission. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. An open redirect exists in versions 5.13.2 and below via the redir parameter on .within.website when Weblate is configured with Anubis and REDIRECT_DOMAINS is not set. An attacker can craft a URL on the legitimate domain that redirects a victim to an attacker-controlled site. The redirect can also be used to initiate drive-by downloads (redirecting to a URL that serves a malicious file), increasing the risk to end users. This issue is fixed in version 5.13.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Termix is a web-based server management platform with SSH terminal, tunneling, and file editing capabilities. The official Docker image for Termix versions 1.5.0 and below, due to being configured with an Nginx reverse proxy, causes the backend to retrieve the proxy's IP instead of the client's IP when using the req.ip method. This results in isLocalhost always returning True. Consequently, the /ssh/db/host/internal endpoint can be accessed directly without login or authentication. This endpoint records the system's stored SSH host information, including addresses, usernames, and passwords, posing an extremely high security risk. Users who use the official Termix docker image, build their own image using the official dockerfile, or utilize reverse proxy functionality will be affected by this vulnerability. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OpenPLC_V3 has a vulnerability in the enipThread function that occurs due to the lack of a return value. This leads to a crash when the server loop ends and execution hits an illegal ud2 instruction. This issue can be triggered remotely without authentication by starting the same server multiple times or if the server exits unexpectedly. The vulnerability allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) against the PLC runtime, stopping any PC started remotely without authentication. This results in the PLC process crashing and halting all automation or control logic managed by OpenPLC.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X