Comparison Overview

Center for Resilience Strategies

VS

GenPsych PC

Center for Resilience Strategies

740 E 18th Ave, Denver, Colorado, 80203, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.crscounseling.com

The Center for Resilience Strategies (CRS) is a counseling & coaching center providing accessible, affordable, and effective mental health services to the Greater Denver Area. CRS provides individual counseling for teens and adults, play therapy, couple and marital therapy, and family therapy. CRS specializes in addressing trauma, life and work stress, anxiety, depression, relationship issues, divorce, childhood disorders, parenting challenges, medical issues, and more. CRS also offers American Sign Language and Spanish-speaking services. CRS works with multiple insurance companies and offers income-based rates for services, all provided in a private practice clinic setting.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

GenPsych PC

380 Foothill Rd, Bridgewater, New Jersey, 08807, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
https://genpsych.com/

GenPsych provides outpatient psychiatric and substance use disorder services dedicated to helping children, teens, adults, and their families restore and maintain emotional and physical health outside of a hospital setting. GenPsych realizes the importance of keeping people in their lives and homes while providing them with convenient and effective psychological services and support. We offer psychiatric evaluations, medication protocols, substance use treatment, group therapy, individual therapy and family therapy all in one of our convenient locations. We operate in various locations in New Jersey - Avenel, Brick, Bridgewater, Livingston, Marlboro, Princeton, Rochelle Park, and Wayne.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 234
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allison-bratsch-lpc-llc.jpeg
Center for Resilience Strategies
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genpsych-pc.jpeg
GenPsych PC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Center for Resilience Strategies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GenPsych PC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Resilience Strategies in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GenPsych PC in 2026.

Incident History — Center for Resilience Strategies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Resilience Strategies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GenPsych PC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GenPsych PC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allison-bratsch-lpc-llc.jpeg
Center for Resilience Strategies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genpsych-pc.jpeg
GenPsych PC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GenPsych PC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Center for Resilience Strategies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GenPsych PC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Center for Resilience Strategies company.

In the current year, GenPsych PC company and Center for Resilience Strategies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GenPsych PC company nor Center for Resilience Strategies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GenPsych PC company nor Center for Resilience Strategies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GenPsych PC company nor Center for Resilience Strategies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Center for Resilience Strategies company nor GenPsych PC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Center for Resilience Strategies nor GenPsych PC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Center for Resilience Strategies company nor GenPsych PC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

GenPsych PC company employs more people globally than Center for Resilience Strategies company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Center for Resilience Strategies nor GenPsych PC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Center for Resilience Strategies nor GenPsych PC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Center for Resilience Strategies nor GenPsych PC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Center for Resilience Strategies nor GenPsych PC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Center for Resilience Strategies nor GenPsych PC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Center for Resilience Strategies nor GenPsych PC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References