Comparison Overview

Allina Health

VS

CHRISTUS Health

Allina Health

The Commons at Midtown Exchange, 2925 Chicago Ave., Minneapolis, MN, US, 55407
Last Update: 2025-12-11

People at Allina Health have a career of making a difference in the lives of the millions of patients we see each year at our 90+ clinics, 12 hospitals and through a wide variety of specialty care services in Minnesota and western Wisconsin. We’re a not-for-profit organization committed to enriching your career by providing ongoing training, competitive compensation, support for work-life balance and ways to give back to the communities we serve. Join our team of 29,000+ employees – your career opportunities are limitless!

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 15,869
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

CHRISTUS Health

919 Hidden Ridge , Irving, TX, US, 75007
Last Update: 2025-12-09

CHRISTUS Health is a Catholic not-for-profit health care system comprising more than 600 centers, including long-term care facilities, community hospitals, walk-in clinics and health ministries. We are a community of 50,000 Associates, with over 15,000 physicians providing personalized care. Our ministries extend to Texas, Louisiana, New Mexico and Arkansas, and throughout the Americas to Chile, Colombia and Mexico. We continue to expand into new communities each year, adding more physicians and more services and bringing care closer to more people. Sponsored by the Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word in Houston and San Antonio and the Sisters of the Holy Family of Nazareth, our mission is to extend the healing ministry of Jesus Christ to every individual we serve.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 27,975
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allina-health.jpeg
Allina Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/christus-health.jpeg
CHRISTUS Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Allina Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CHRISTUS Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allina Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CHRISTUS Health in 2025.

Incident History — Allina Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allina Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CHRISTUS Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CHRISTUS Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allina-health.jpeg
Allina Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/christus-health.jpeg
CHRISTUS Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CHRISTUS Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Allina Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Allina Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas CHRISTUS Health company has not reported any.

In the current year, CHRISTUS Health company and Allina Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Allina Health company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while CHRISTUS Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither CHRISTUS Health company nor Allina Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CHRISTUS Health company nor Allina Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Allina Health company nor CHRISTUS Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Allina Health nor CHRISTUS Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Allina Health company nor CHRISTUS Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CHRISTUS Health company employs more people globally than Allina Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Allina Health nor CHRISTUS Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Allina Health nor CHRISTUS Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Allina Health nor CHRISTUS Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Allina Health nor CHRISTUS Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Allina Health nor CHRISTUS Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Allina Health nor CHRISTUS Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N