Comparison Overview

Allina Health

VS

Addus HomeCare

Allina Health

The Commons at Midtown Exchange, 2925 Chicago Ave., Minneapolis, MN, US, 55407
Last Update: 2026-01-18

People at Allina Health have a career of making a difference in the lives of the millions of patients we see each year at our 90+ clinics, 12 hospitals and through a wide variety of specialty care services in Minnesota and western Wisconsin. We’re a not-for-profit organization committed to enriching your career by providing ongoing training, competitive compensation, support for work-life balance and ways to give back to the communities we serve. Join our team of 29,000+ employees – your career opportunities are limitless!

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 15,999
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Addus HomeCare

6303 Cowboys Way Suite 600 Frisco, Texas 75034, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

Addus HomeCare is one of the nation's largest and fastest growing providers of personal home care and support services. Since 1979, Addus has built an exceptional home care company through a commitment to improving the health and wellness of our clients and providing high-quality, cost-effective care. Currently, we have more than 200 locations and employ over 30,000, and are positioned to excel under healthcare reform. We are passionate about the service we provide to our clients and the positive rewarding environment we create for our employees, and are driven to be both the provider and employer of choice in all of the markets we serve. Our Mission: Providing cost-effective care and assistance that gives people the freedom to remain in their homes. Our Values: Service Make a difference in another person's life. Honesty Be trustworthy and fair. Compassion Treat others with kindness and dignity. Accountability Keep your word. Leadership Set the right example.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allina-health.jpeg
Allina Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/addus-homecare-inc.jpeg
Addus HomeCare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Allina Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Addus HomeCare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allina Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Addus HomeCare in 2026.

Incident History — Allina Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allina Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Addus HomeCare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Addus HomeCare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allina-health.jpeg
Allina Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/addus-homecare-inc.jpeg
Addus HomeCare
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Addus HomeCare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Allina Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Allina Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Addus HomeCare company has not reported any.

In the current year, Addus HomeCare company and Allina Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Allina Health company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Addus HomeCare company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Addus HomeCare company nor Allina Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Addus HomeCare company nor Allina Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Allina Health company nor Addus HomeCare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Allina Health nor Addus HomeCare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Allina Health company nor Addus HomeCare company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Allina Health company employs more people globally than Addus HomeCare company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Allina Health nor Addus HomeCare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Allina Health nor Addus HomeCare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Allina Health nor Addus HomeCare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Allina Health nor Addus HomeCare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Allina Health nor Addus HomeCare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Allina Health nor Addus HomeCare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N