Comparison Overview

Allied Title Company

VS

Warners Solicitors

Allied Title Company

4920 NIAGARA RD, College Park, 20740, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Allied Title Company, LLC is an Independent title agency, offering Commercial and Residential title and escrow services to the Greater Washington, Maryland Metropolitan area. We are conveniently located in College Park, Maryland and are approximately five Minutes from the 495 Beltway and the Landmark Ikea Store. We are Customer focused and our clients are our number one priority. Our Goal is to guide our client through the Real Estate Settlement process, by Providing them with Accurate, impartial and on time information. Allied Title handles settlement and issue title Insurance underwritten by Southern Title Insurance Company.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Warners Solicitors

Bank House, Bank Street, Tonbridge, Kent, GB, TN9 1BL
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Warners is a leading law firm in the South East committed to providing quality advice to its clients. Warners offers a wide range of legal services to individuals, businesses, and organisations of all sizes. Warners is known for its innovative legal approach and its dedication to client care. Warners is regularly recognised by the leading legal directories Chambers & Partners and Legal 500 as offering some of the best legal advice in the region.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 125
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Allied Title Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/warners-solicitors.jpeg
Warners Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Allied Title Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Warners Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allied Title Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Warners Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — Allied Title Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allied Title Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Warners Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Warners Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Allied Title Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/warners-solicitors.jpeg
Warners Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Allied Title Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Warners Solicitors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Warners Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Allied Title Company company.

In the current year, Warners Solicitors company and Allied Title Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Warners Solicitors company nor Allied Title Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Warners Solicitors company nor Allied Title Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Warners Solicitors company nor Allied Title Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Allied Title Company company nor Warners Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Allied Title Company nor Warners Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Allied Title Company company nor Warners Solicitors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Warners Solicitors company employs more people globally than Allied Title Company company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Allied Title Company nor Warners Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Allied Title Company nor Warners Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Allied Title Company nor Warners Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Allied Title Company nor Warners Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Allied Title Company nor Warners Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Allied Title Company nor Warners Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X