Comparison Overview

Allianz Partners

VS

Tokio Marine Group

Allianz Partners

Eurosquare 2, Saint-Ouen, France, 93400, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Allianz Partners is a world leader in B2B2C insurance and assistance, offering global solutions that span international health and life, travel insurance, automotive and assistance. Customer driven, our innovative experts are redefining insurance services by delivering future-ready, high-tech high-touch products and solutions that go beyond traditional insurance. Our products are embedded seamlessly into our partners’ businesses, sold through intermediary channels or directly to customers through the Allianz brand. Present in 75 countries, our 21,100 employees speak 70 languages, handle over 71 million cases each year, and are motivated to go the extra mile to offer peace of mind to our customers around the world. As part of the Allianz Group, we are proud to be the Worldwide Insurance Partner of the Olympic and Paralympic Movements. For more information, please visit: www.allianz-partners.com

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 11,759
Subsidiaries: 107
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
3

Tokio Marine Group

Tokyo, JP
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Tokio Marine Group is a global insurance group that provides safety and security to customers worldwide. The Group consists of Tokio Marine Holdings and over 250 subsidiaries and 26 affiliates located in more than 480 cities in 46 countries and regions worldwide, operating extensively in the non-life (P&C) insurance business, life insurance business, and financial and general businesses. The insurance business is based upon the commitment to be there for our clients in their moment of need. It is a people’s business, therefore our people and the trust they engender is everything. We will continue to build a workforce that has been empowered and enabled to think and act from the customer's point of view and to live up to our corporate vision to be a Good Company.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 16,186
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allianz-partners.jpeg
Allianz Partners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tokio-marine-holdings.jpeg
Tokio Marine Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Allianz Partners
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tokio Marine Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allianz Partners in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tokio Marine Group in 2025.

Incident History — Allianz Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tokio Marine Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tokio Marine Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allianz-partners.jpeg
Allianz Partners
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party CRM compromise, Malware deployment (ransomware), Unauthorized access
Motivation: Data Theft, Financial Gain (likely)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Salesforce Instances, Data Exfiltration
Motivation: Financial Gain, Extortion, Data Theft for Resale or Fraud
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Third-party cloud-based CRM system
Motivation: Data theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tokio-marine-holdings.jpeg
Tokio Marine Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Tokio Marine Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Allianz Partners company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Allianz Partners company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Tokio Marine Group company.

In the current year, Allianz Partners company has reported more cyber incidents than Tokio Marine Group company.

Both Tokio Marine Group company and Allianz Partners company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

Allianz Partners company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Tokio Marine Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Allianz Partners company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Tokio Marine Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Allianz Partners company nor Tokio Marine Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Allianz Partners nor Tokio Marine Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Allianz Partners company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Tokio Marine Group company.

Tokio Marine Group company employs more people globally than Allianz Partners company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Allianz Partners nor Tokio Marine Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Allianz Partners nor Tokio Marine Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Allianz Partners nor Tokio Marine Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Allianz Partners nor Tokio Marine Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Allianz Partners nor Tokio Marine Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Allianz Partners nor Tokio Marine Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H