Comparison Overview

Allianz Partners

VS

Great Eastern

Allianz Partners

Eurosquare 2, Saint-Ouen, 93400, FR
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.allianz-partners.com/

Allianz Partners is a world leader in B2B2C insurance and assistance, offering global solutions that span international health and life, travel insurance, automotive and assistance. Customer driven, our innovative experts are redefining insurance services by delivering future-ready, high-tech high-touch products and solutions that go beyond traditional insurance. Our products are embedded seamlessly into our partners’ businesses or sold directly to customers, and are available through four commercial brands: Allianz Assistance, Allianz Automotive, Allianz Travel and Allianz Care. Present in 75 countries, our 21,100 employees speak 70 languages, handle over 71 million cases each year, and are motivated to go the extra mile to offer peace of mind to our customers around the world. As part of the Allianz Group, we are proud to be the Worldwide Insurance Partner of the Olympic and Paralympic Movements. For more information, please visit: www.allianz-partners.com

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 12,294
Subsidiaries: 107
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
3
View Profile

Great Eastern

1 Pickering Street , Singapore, 048659, SG
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.greateasternlife.com

For 117 years, we have been helping customers across generations by protecting, preserving and growing what matters to them. As One Great Eastern Group today, we are enabling the goals of over 15.5 million customers by taking care of their needs across life, health, wealth and general insurance, consistently innovating to help them #ReachforGreat!

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 14,366
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allianz-partners.jpeg
Allianz Partners
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-eastern-group.jpeg
Great Eastern
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Allianz Partners
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Great Eastern
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allianz Partners in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Great Eastern in 2026.

Incident History — Allianz Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Great Eastern (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Great Eastern cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allianz-partners.jpeg
Allianz Partners
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party CRM compromise, Malware deployment (ransomware), Unauthorized access
Motivation: Data Theft, Financial Gain (likely)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Salesforce Instances, Data Exfiltration
Motivation: Financial Gain, Extortion, Data Theft for Resale or Fraud
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Social Engineering, Impersonation (IT Personnel), Unauthorized Remote Access, Exploitation of Salesforce Data Loader Tool
Motivation: Data Theft, Extortion (potential, unconfirmed)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/great-eastern-group.jpeg
Great Eastern
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2019
Type:Data Leak
Motivation: Financial and Political
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Allianz Partners company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Great Eastern company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Allianz Partners company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Great Eastern company.

In the current year, Great Eastern company and Allianz Partners company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Allianz Partners company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Great Eastern company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Allianz Partners company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Great Eastern company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Allianz Partners company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Great Eastern company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Allianz Partners company nor Great Eastern company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Allianz Partners nor Great Eastern holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Allianz Partners company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Great Eastern company.

Great Eastern company employs more people globally than Allianz Partners company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Allianz Partners nor Great Eastern holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Allianz Partners nor Great Eastern holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Allianz Partners nor Great Eastern holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Allianz Partners nor Great Eastern holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Allianz Partners nor Great Eastern holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Allianz Partners nor Great Eastern holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References