Comparison Overview

Allianz Commercial

VS

MetLife

Allianz Commercial

None
Last Update: 2025-11-24

Allianz Commercial is the center of expertise and global line of Allianz Group for insuring mid-sized businesses, large enterprises and specialist risks. Among our customers are the world’s largest consumer brands, financial institutions and industry players, the global aviation and shipping industry as well as family-owned and medium enterprises which are the backbone of the economy. Powered by the employees, financial strength, and network of the world’s #1 insurance brand Allianz, we work together to help our customers prepare for what’s ahead: They trust on us for providing a wide range of traditional and alternative risk transfer solutions, outstanding risk consulting and multinational services as well as seamless claims handling. Allianz Commercial brings together the large corporate insurance business of Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty (AGCS) and the commercial insurance business of national Allianz Property & Casualty entities serving mid-sized companies. We are present in over 200 countries and territories either though our own teams or the Allianz Group network and partners. Disclaimer: https://commercial.allianz.com/credits.html

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 4,469
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

MetLife

200 Park Ave, None, New York, NY, US, 10166
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 600 and 649

We live in a time of unprecedented change. A time when economies, regulations, and social safety nets are all in flux. Customers around the globe have told us they’re overwhelmed by the pace of change and are looking for a trusted partner to help them manage life’s twists and turns. MetLife is committed to being that partner. That’s why we’re transforming our business: Delivering greater value for the people we serve by becoming a simpler, more focused, and future-facing company. We’ll be introducing new ways to meet our customers’ evolving needs, with flexible products; simpler, more intuitive experiences and a range of new services. MetLife. Navigating life together. For customer service: https://www.metlife.com/support-and-manage/contact-us/ For social media notices: https://www.metlife.com/about-us/terms-and-conditions/social-media/ MetLife, Inc. (NYSE: MET), through its subsidiaries and affiliates (“MetLife”), is one of the world’s leading financial services companies, providing insurance, annuities, employee benefits and asset management to help its individual and institutional customers navigate their changing world. Founded in 1868, MetLife has operations in more than 40 markets globally and holds leading positions in the United States, Japan, Latin America, Asia, Europe and the Middle East.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 42,313
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allianz-commercial.jpeg
Allianz Commercial
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metlife.jpeg
MetLife
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Allianz Commercial
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MetLife
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

Allianz Commercial has 49.25% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

MetLife has 49.25% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Allianz Commercial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz Commercial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MetLife (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MetLife cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allianz-commercial.jpeg
Allianz Commercial
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Phishing/Social Engineering, Compromised Credentials, Fake Help Desk Calls (e.g., Scattered Spider), Supply Chain Vulnerabilities, Cloud Security Incidents, Generative AI-Enhanced Scams
Motivation: Financial Gain (Ransom Payments), Data Theft for Resale (Dark Web), Disruption of Business Operations, Exploitation of Supply Chain Weaknesses
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Social Engineering (e.g., impersonation of employees), Exploitation of Digital Supply Chain Vulnerabilities, Targeted Attacks on SMEs/Less Resilient Firms, Seasonal Attacks (e.g., Black Friday to Year-End)
Motivation: Financial Gain (Extortion/Ransom), Data Theft for Resale (Dark Web), Exploitation of Seasonal Vulnerabilities (e.g., Holiday Shopping)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metlife.jpeg
MetLife
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Coding Transmission Error
Blog: Blog

FAQ

MetLife company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Allianz Commercial company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

MetLife company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Allianz Commercial company.

In the current year, MetLife and Allianz Commercial have reported a similar number of cyber incidents.

Both MetLife company and Allianz Commercial company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

MetLife company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Allianz Commercial company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither MetLife company nor Allianz Commercial company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Allianz Commercial company nor MetLife company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Allianz Commercial nor MetLife holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MetLife company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Allianz Commercial company.

MetLife company employs more people globally than Allianz Commercial company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Allianz Commercial nor MetLife holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Allianz Commercial nor MetLife holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Allianz Commercial nor MetLife holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Allianz Commercial nor MetLife holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Allianz Commercial nor MetLife holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Allianz Commercial nor MetLife holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H