Comparison Overview

Alliance Work Partners

VS

Guidepost DBT

Alliance Work Partners

2525 Wallingwood Drive, Austin, TX, 78746, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

AWP is one of the largest freestanding, non-profit EAPs in the nation. We’ve been designing and delivering customized organizational wellness solutions, such as EAP, Work-Life, and Wellness Programs, since 1977. Since AWP has no financial ties to insurance or treatment plans, our best practice-based, ethical independence guarantees superior ROI, employee cost savings, and effective health care cost management.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Guidepost DBT

300 Tamal Plaza, Corte Madera, California, 94925, US
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799

Who we are: At the Guidepost DBT we provide a broad spectrum of psychotherapy services. We are intensively trained in the DBT approach and our mission is to provide collaborative, compassionate, and effective treatments which reduce misery and suffering and promote happiness and improved quality in the lives of our clients. What we offer: Overall we offer individual, couple, family and group therapy for adolescents, adults and older adults as well as training and consultation for professionals. We also provide assessment and diagnosis for a wide variety of mental health issues. Complete DBT Program - including individual therapy, skills training group, telephone coaching and DBT team consultation Advanced Skills and Support Group - a way for DBT graduates to maintain and deepen their skills Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy for Depression and other mindfulness-oriented individual and group therapies. Family Support and Psychoeducation - individual and group consultation for relatives of those with BPD and other disorders.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alliance-work-partners.jpeg
Alliance Work Partners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dbt-center-of-marin.jpeg
Guidepost DBT
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Alliance Work Partners
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Guidepost DBT
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alliance Work Partners in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Guidepost DBT in 2026.

Incident History — Alliance Work Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alliance Work Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Guidepost DBT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Guidepost DBT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alliance-work-partners.jpeg
Alliance Work Partners
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dbt-center-of-marin.jpeg
Guidepost DBT
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Alliance Work Partners company and Guidepost DBT company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Guidepost DBT company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Alliance Work Partners company.

In the current year, Guidepost DBT company and Alliance Work Partners company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Guidepost DBT company nor Alliance Work Partners company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Guidepost DBT company nor Alliance Work Partners company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Guidepost DBT company nor Alliance Work Partners company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Alliance Work Partners company nor Guidepost DBT company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Alliance Work Partners nor Guidepost DBT holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Alliance Work Partners company nor Guidepost DBT company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Alliance Work Partners company employs more people globally than Guidepost DBT company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Alliance Work Partners nor Guidepost DBT holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Alliance Work Partners nor Guidepost DBT holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Alliance Work Partners nor Guidepost DBT holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Alliance Work Partners nor Guidepost DBT holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Alliance Work Partners nor Guidepost DBT holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Alliance Work Partners nor Guidepost DBT holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N