Comparison Overview

Alliance for Health Policy

VS

John C. Stennis Institute of Government

Alliance for Health Policy

1225 19th St NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20036, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Alliance for Health Policy is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit organization dedicated to helping policymakers and the public better understand health policy, the root of the nation’s health care issues, and the trade-offs posed by various proposals for change. We believe a better health care system begins with a balanced exchange of evidence, experience, and multiple perspectives. Regardless of their point of view, our audience recognizes the Alliance’s reputation as a well-respected source for unbiased health policy information. Our Vision: A better health care system achieved through balanced exchange of evidence, experience, and multiple perspectives. Our Mission: To inform solutions for improving health care in the United States by bringing together policymakers and health leaders in nonpartisan forums. We advance learning and dialogue about fundamental and emerging health care issues and the trade-offs posed by proposals by change.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

John C. Stennis Institute of Government

382 Hardy Rd, Starkville, Mississippi, 39762, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

The John C. Stennis Institute of Government performs a threefold mission: (1) to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of Mississippi state and local governments through basic and applied research, training, technical assistance, and service; (2) to provide technical assistance and research for both rural development in Mississippi and regional activities in the Southeast; and (3) to promote civic education and citizen involvement in the political process.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alliance-for-health-policy.jpeg
Alliance for Health Policy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/john-c.-stennis-institute-of-government.jpeg
John C. Stennis Institute of Government
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Alliance for Health Policy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
John C. Stennis Institute of Government
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alliance for Health Policy in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for John C. Stennis Institute of Government in 2025.

Incident History — Alliance for Health Policy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alliance for Health Policy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — John C. Stennis Institute of Government (X = Date, Y = Severity)

John C. Stennis Institute of Government cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alliance-for-health-policy.jpeg
Alliance for Health Policy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/john-c.-stennis-institute-of-government.jpeg
John C. Stennis Institute of Government
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

John C. Stennis Institute of Government company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Alliance for Health Policy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, John C. Stennis Institute of Government company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Alliance for Health Policy company.

In the current year, John C. Stennis Institute of Government company and Alliance for Health Policy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither John C. Stennis Institute of Government company nor Alliance for Health Policy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither John C. Stennis Institute of Government company nor Alliance for Health Policy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither John C. Stennis Institute of Government company nor Alliance for Health Policy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Alliance for Health Policy company nor John C. Stennis Institute of Government company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Alliance for Health Policy nor John C. Stennis Institute of Government holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Alliance for Health Policy company nor John C. Stennis Institute of Government company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Alliance for Health Policy company employs more people globally than John C. Stennis Institute of Government company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Alliance for Health Policy nor John C. Stennis Institute of Government holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Alliance for Health Policy nor John C. Stennis Institute of Government holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Alliance for Health Policy nor John C. Stennis Institute of Government holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Alliance for Health Policy nor John C. Stennis Institute of Government holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Alliance for Health Policy nor John C. Stennis Institute of Government holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Alliance for Health Policy nor John C. Stennis Institute of Government holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H