Comparison Overview

Allen Company

VS

TentBox

Allen Company

609 S 104th St, Louisville, Colorado, US, 80027
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Allen Company is a leading supplier of outdoor products, specializing in the hunting, shooting, archery and fishing industries. Continuously striving to improve our product design and quality by listening to our customers, the company has set its goal to make the Allen name known and trusted for the quality and value of our products. Allen Company was founded in 1970 and is headquartered in Louisville, Colorado.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 98
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TentBox

39 Botley Road, North Baddesley, S052 9AE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

TentBox was founded in 2016 and is now the UK’s #1 Roof Top Tent brand. We're a British based company on a mission to build an inclusive, fun and happy community of TentBoxers across the world. We are revolutionising adventure by making the outdoors accessible to all. Our aim is to connect like-minded people through our common love for the wild. We're actively looking to partner with like-minded brands and companies internationally so if your company fits our ethos, please get in touch!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allen-company.jpeg
Allen Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tentbox.jpeg
TentBox
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Allen Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TentBox
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allen Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TentBox in 2025.

Incident History — Allen Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allen Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TentBox (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TentBox cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allen-company.jpeg
Allen Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tentbox.jpeg
TentBox
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Allen Company company and TentBox company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, TentBox company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Allen Company company.

In the current year, TentBox company and Allen Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TentBox company nor Allen Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither TentBox company nor Allen Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither TentBox company nor Allen Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Allen Company company nor TentBox company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Allen Company nor TentBox holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Allen Company company nor TentBox company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Allen Company company employs more people globally than TentBox company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Allen Company nor TentBox holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Allen Company nor TentBox holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Allen Company nor TentBox holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Allen Company nor TentBox holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Allen Company nor TentBox holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Allen Company nor TentBox holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H