Comparison Overview

Allen Company

VS

Run2Day

Allen Company

609 S 104th St, Louisville, Colorado, US, 80027
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Allen Company is a leading supplier of outdoor products, specializing in the hunting, shooting, archery and fishing industries. Continuously striving to improve our product design and quality by listening to our customers, the company has set its goal to make the Allen name known and trusted for the quality and value of our products. Allen Company was founded in 1970 and is headquartered in Louisville, Colorado.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 98
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Run2Day

Mariastraat 10, Utrecht, 3511 LP, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Run2Day maakt hardlopen nog leuker! Run2Day vindt het belangrijk dat je plezier hebt en behoudt in het hardlopen. Functionele kleding, de juiste schoen en een goed advies dragen bij aan dit plezier. Wij kennen het plezier, de spierpijn, de vermoeidheid, het afzien, de training waar je eigenlijk geen zin in hebt maar als je gaat dan ben je maar al te blij dat je geweest bent. Ja, daar hebben we allemaal weleens mee te maken. Daarom nemen wij alleen genoegen met de beste producten zodat we het beste uit het hardlopen kunnen halen! Service en kwaliteit staan bij ons centraal In de Run2Day winkels kun je onder meer terecht voor een loopanalyse. Middels deze loopanalyse krijg je een schoenadvies op maat, zodat je weet welke hardloopschoen past bij jouw loopstijl. We hebben een ruime collectie hardloopschoenen van verschillende merken. Naast schoenen kun je in onze winkels terecht voor trendy en functionele kleding, hartslaghorloges, boeken, accessoires. Kortom een uitgebreid assortiment aan hardloopartikelen!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 105
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allen-company.jpeg
Allen Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/run2day.jpeg
Run2Day
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Allen Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Run2Day
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allen Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Run2Day in 2025.

Incident History — Allen Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allen Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Run2Day (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Run2Day cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allen-company.jpeg
Allen Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/run2day.jpeg
Run2Day
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Run2Day company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Allen Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Run2Day company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Allen Company company.

In the current year, Run2Day company and Allen Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Run2Day company nor Allen Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Run2Day company nor Allen Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Run2Day company nor Allen Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Allen Company company nor Run2Day company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Allen Company nor Run2Day holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Allen Company company nor Run2Day company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Run2Day company employs more people globally than Allen Company company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Allen Company nor Run2Day holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Allen Company nor Run2Day holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Allen Company nor Run2Day holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Allen Company nor Run2Day holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Allen Company nor Run2Day holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Allen Company nor Run2Day holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H