Comparison Overview

ALLEN

VS

Jefferson County Public Schools

ALLEN

ALLEN Career Institute “SANKALP” CP-6, Indra Vihar, Kota, 324005, IN
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

ALLEN Career Institute is a name that echoes with 'Quality Education' finely blended with 'Values, Morals & Ethics.' ALLEN started its marvelous journey of nurturing students 36 years ago. ALLEN's unmatched pedagogy and quest to deliver the best has earned it the stature of being a pioneer name in IITJEE & NEET Test Preparation. ALLEN has churned out Top Results in IIT JEE (Adv.), JEE (Main), NEET-UG, KVPY, Olympiads, SAT, ACT, TOEFL, and IELTS. Today, ALLEN has expanded its roots in 64 cities. ALLEN has nurtured students through its Classroom Courses, Distance Learning Courses, and Online Courses. These courses are the epitome of perfectionism & proficiency, and they guide students to the peak of their preparation while simultaneously covering their school syllabus (CBSE & other Boards). ALLEN is the only institute that has produced 18 All India Rank-1 in both NEET and Pre-Engineering (IIT JEE Advanced) Examinations, which is a National Record in itself. ALLEN's Pan India Presence: Kota (HO) | Ahmedabad | Akola | Alwar | Amritsar | Bathinda | Bengaluru | Bhilwara | Bhopal | Bhubaneswar | Bikaner | Bilaspur | Chandigarh, Panchkula & Mohali | Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar | Chennai | Churu-Taranagar | Coimbatore | Dehradun | Delhi | Dibrugarh | Durgapur | Guwahati | Gwalior | Hisar | Hubballi | Indore | Jaipur | Jammu | Jhunjhunu | Jodhpur | Khanapara | Kochi | Kolkata | Latur | Lucknow | Madurai | Mangaluru | Mumbai | Mysuru | Nagpur | Nanded | Nashik | Palanpur | Patna | Puducherry | Pune | Raipur | Rajkot | Ranchi | Rawatbhata | Rohtak | Sikar | Siliguri | Srinagar | Surat | Tirupati | Udaipur | Ujjain | Vadodara School Integrated Program Centers: Bundi | Buldana | Paavai Divisions: ALLEN IITJEE, NEET and Commerce Coaching, ALLEN Digital, ALLEN Overseas, ALLEN Distance Learning Program, ALLEN Online Test Series, ALLEN Pre-Nurture and Career Foundation, ALLEN Global, ALLEN ACE & SKOOLPlus.

NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 12,524
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jefferson County Public Schools

3332 Newburg Road, Louisville, 40223, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18

— 30th largest school district in the U.S. — 96,000+ students — 17,400+ full- and part-time employees, including 6,800+ certified teachers Vision All JCPS students graduate prepared, empowered, and inspired to reach their full potential and contribute as thoughtful, responsible citizens of our diverse shared world. Mission To challenge and engage each learner to grow through effective teaching and meaningful experiences with caring, supportive environments Core Values • Caring—All JCPS children are nurtured as if they are our own. • Equity—All students receive an education that gives them what they need to thrive through differentiated supports focused on removing social factors as a predictor of success. • Excellence—Empowering people to lead, create, and innovate is essential to creating a culture of excellence. • Respect—All students, staff, and families are treated with dignity and respect as members of a safe and welcoming learning community. • Individuality—Children learn differently and require personalized approaches to learning. • Diversity—Our diversity is a strength—differences of each are assets of the whole. • Opportunity—Effective teaching is the most powerful tool for engaging and motivating students to reach their full potential. • Creativity—The abilities to create, innovate, and solve challenging problems are critical skills for educators and children to develop and employ in teaching and learning. • Collaboration—Relationships, cooperation, and partnerships among students, staff, families, and community are fundamental to the success of our students. • Stewardship—Adults model integrity, respect, and responsibility through mindful stewardship of talents, resources, and time.

NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 13,057
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allen-career-institute.jpeg
ALLEN
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jefferson-county-public-schools.jpeg
Jefferson County Public Schools
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ALLEN
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jefferson County Public Schools
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ALLEN in 2026.

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jefferson County Public Schools in 2026.

Incident History — ALLEN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ALLEN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jefferson County Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jefferson County Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allen-career-institute.jpeg
ALLEN
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jefferson-county-public-schools.jpeg
Jefferson County Public Schools
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ALLEN company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jefferson County Public Schools company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jefferson County Public Schools company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ALLEN company.

In the current year, Jefferson County Public Schools company and ALLEN company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jefferson County Public Schools company nor ALLEN company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jefferson County Public Schools company nor ALLEN company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jefferson County Public Schools company nor ALLEN company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ALLEN company nor Jefferson County Public Schools company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ALLEN nor Jefferson County Public Schools holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ALLEN company nor Jefferson County Public Schools company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Jefferson County Public Schools company employs more people globally than ALLEN company, reflecting its scale as a Education Administration Programs.

Neither ALLEN nor Jefferson County Public Schools holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ALLEN nor Jefferson County Public Schools holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ALLEN nor Jefferson County Public Schools holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ALLEN nor Jefferson County Public Schools holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ALLEN nor Jefferson County Public Schools holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ALLEN nor Jefferson County Public Schools holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N