Comparison Overview

Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc

VS

M&M Printed Bag, Inc.

Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc

5610 W 65th Street, Little Rock, AR, 72209, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.AllegraLittleRock.com

Traditional offset and short-run digital printing; marketing collateral; direct mail campaigns; high volume digital black & white or color copying; high-quality bindery, finishing & fulfillment services; corporate identity & branding; innovative promotional items and trade show materials; on-site storage and inventory management; corporate apparel; variable data marketing; signs, posters & banners; state-of-the-art computerized order history and usage analysis.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

M&M Printed Bag, Inc.

5651 Kimball Ct, Chino, California, 91710, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
https://www.mmprintedbag.com/

At M&M Printed Bag, Inc. our Plastic Bags product line is diverse and designed to meet the specific needs of various sectors. In addition to our standard plastic bags, we also provide specialty bags tailored to specific industry needs. These include anti-static bags, tamper-evident bags, biohazard bags, and more. These specialized bags are designed to address unique packaging challenges and ensure the safety and security of the contents.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allegra-print-&-imaging-of-arkansas-inc.jpeg
Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m&m-printed-bag-inc.jpeg
M&M Printed Bag, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
M&M Printed Bag, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for M&M Printed Bag, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — M&M Printed Bag, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

M&M Printed Bag, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allegra-print-&-imaging-of-arkansas-inc.jpeg
Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/m&m-printed-bag-inc.jpeg
M&M Printed Bag, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc company and M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc company.

In the current year, M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company and Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company nor Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company nor Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company nor Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc company nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc company nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc company employs more people globally than M&M Printed Bag, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Allegra Print & Imaging of Arkansas, Inc nor M&M Printed Bag, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References