Comparison Overview

Allegheny Health Network

VS

Stanford Health Care

Allegheny Health Network

4800 Friendship Ave, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US, 15224
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ahn.org

Allegheny Health Network is an integrated health care delivery system serving the greater Western Pennsylvania region. More than 2,600 physicians and 21,000 employees serve the system's 14 hospitals as well as its ambulatory medical and surgery centers, Health + Wellness Pavilions, and hundreds of physician practice locations. AHN is a proud part of Highmark Health.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,282
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3
View Profile

Stanford Health Care

500 Pasteur Dr, None, Palo Alto, California, US, 94304
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://stanfordhealthcare.org

Stanford Health Care, with multiple facilities throughout the Bay Area, is internationally renowned for leading edge and coordinated care in cancer care, neurosciences, cardiovascular medicine, surgery, organ transplant, medicine specialties, and primary care. Throughout its history, Stanford has been at the forefront of discovery and innovation, as researchers and clinicians work together to improve health, alleviate suffering, and translate medical breakthroughs into better ways to deliver patient care. Stanford Health Care: Healing humanity through science and compassion, one patient at a time. At Stanford Health Care, your career is supported within a distinctive hospital culture. This environment compliments the pioneering, collaborative atmosphere that has earned us our worldwide reputation for excellence.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 14,759
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allegheny-health-network.jpeg
Allegheny Health Network
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stanford-health-care.jpeg
Stanford Health Care
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Allegheny Health Network
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stanford Health Care
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allegheny Health Network in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stanford Health Care in 2025.

Incident History — Allegheny Health Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allegheny Health Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stanford Health Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stanford Health Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allegheny-health-network.jpeg
Allegheny Health Network
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Account Takeover
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External Hacking
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stanford-health-care.jpeg
Stanford Health Care
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of MOVEit Transfer Server Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Allegheny Health Network company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stanford Health Care company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Allegheny Health Network company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Stanford Health Care company.

In the current year, Stanford Health Care company and Allegheny Health Network company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stanford Health Care company nor Allegheny Health Network company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Stanford Health Care company and Allegheny Health Network company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Allegheny Health Network company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Stanford Health Care company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Allegheny Health Network company nor Stanford Health Care company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Allegheny Health Network nor Stanford Health Care holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Allegheny Health Network company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Stanford Health Care company.

Stanford Health Care company employs more people globally than Allegheny Health Network company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Allegheny Health Network nor Stanford Health Care holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Allegheny Health Network nor Stanford Health Care holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Allegheny Health Network nor Stanford Health Care holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Allegheny Health Network nor Stanford Health Care holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Allegheny Health Network nor Stanford Health Care holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Allegheny Health Network nor Stanford Health Care holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References