Comparison Overview

Allegheny Health Network

VS

Hospital Authority

Allegheny Health Network

4800 Friendship Ave, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, US, 15224
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Allegheny Health Network is an integrated health care delivery system serving the greater Western Pennsylvania region. More than 2,600 physicians and 21,000 employees serve the system's 14 hospitals as well as its ambulatory medical and surgery centers, Health + Wellness Pavilions, and hundreds of physician practice locations. AHN is a proud part of Highmark Health.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,282
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Hospital Authority

Hospital Authority Building, Hong Kong, undefined, 852, HK
Last Update: 2025-12-09

The Hospital Authority (HA) is a statutory body established under the Hospital Authority Ordinance in 1990. We have been responsible for managing Hong Kong's public hospitals services since December 1991. We are accountable to the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government through the Secretary for Health, who formulates overall health policies for Hong Kong and overseas the work of HA.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,255
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allegheny-health-network.jpeg
Allegheny Health Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hospital-authority.jpeg
Hospital Authority
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Allegheny Health Network
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hospital Authority
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allegheny Health Network in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hospital Authority in 2025.

Incident History — Allegheny Health Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allegheny Health Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hospital Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hospital Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allegheny-health-network.jpeg
Allegheny Health Network
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Account Takeover
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External Hacking
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hospital-authority.jpeg
Hospital Authority
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Allegheny Health Network company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hospital Authority company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Allegheny Health Network company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Hospital Authority company has not reported any.

In the current year, Hospital Authority company and Allegheny Health Network company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hospital Authority company nor Allegheny Health Network company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Allegheny Health Network company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Hospital Authority company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Allegheny Health Network company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Hospital Authority company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Allegheny Health Network company nor Hospital Authority company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Allegheny Health Network nor Hospital Authority holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Allegheny Health Network company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hospital Authority company.

Allegheny Health Network company employs more people globally than Hospital Authority company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Allegheny Health Network nor Hospital Authority holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Allegheny Health Network nor Hospital Authority holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Allegheny Health Network nor Hospital Authority holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Allegheny Health Network nor Hospital Authority holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Allegheny Health Network nor Hospital Authority holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Allegheny Health Network nor Hospital Authority holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N