Comparison Overview

Al Jazeera English

VS

Fashion Dive

Al Jazeera English

Doha, QA
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Al Jazeera is an independent news organisation funded in part by the Qatari government. Launched in 1996, Al Jazeera Arabic was the first independent news channel in the Arab world dedicated to providing comprehensive news and live debate. Al Jazeera English, which was launched in 2006, is part of a growing network comprising more than 10 channels and divisions. The network challenged established narratives and gave a global audience an alternative voice, one that put the people back at the centre of the news agenda, and quickly made it one of the world’s most influential news networks. Each subsidiary in the Al Jazeera Media Network follows the same principles and values that inspire it to be challenging and bold, and to provide a voice for the voiceless in some of the world’s most unreported places. It’s a responsibility shared by every employee at the Al Jazeera Media Network, from our headquarters to our broadcast centres.

NAICS: 5191311
NAICS Definition: Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fashion Dive

1100 15th St NW, Washington, 20005, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Fashion Dive provides in-depth journalism and insight into the most impactful news and trends shaping the fashion & apparel industry. The daily email newsletter and website cover topics such as brands, supply chain, retail, compliance, financial/business, tech, sustainability, and more. Fashion Dive is a leading industry publication operated by Industry Dive. Our business journalists spark ideas and shape agendas for 13+ million decision-makers in the most competitive industries.

NAICS: 5191311
NAICS Definition: Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aljazeera-english.jpeg
Al Jazeera English
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fashion-industry-news.jpeg
Fashion Dive
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Al Jazeera English
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fashion Dive
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Internet News Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Al Jazeera English in 2026.

Incidents vs Internet News Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fashion Dive in 2026.

Incident History — Al Jazeera English (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Al Jazeera English cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fashion Dive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fashion Dive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aljazeera-english.jpeg
Al Jazeera English
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fashion-industry-news.jpeg
Fashion Dive
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Al Jazeera English company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fashion Dive company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fashion Dive company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Al Jazeera English company.

In the current year, Fashion Dive company and Al Jazeera English company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fashion Dive company nor Al Jazeera English company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fashion Dive company nor Al Jazeera English company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fashion Dive company nor Al Jazeera English company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Al Jazeera English company nor Fashion Dive company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Al Jazeera English nor Fashion Dive holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fashion Dive company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Al Jazeera English company.

Both Al Jazeera English company and Fashion Dive company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Al Jazeera English nor Fashion Dive holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Al Jazeera English nor Fashion Dive holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Al Jazeera English nor Fashion Dive holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Al Jazeera English nor Fashion Dive holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Al Jazeera English nor Fashion Dive holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Al Jazeera English nor Fashion Dive holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.