Comparison Overview

Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa

VS

Belterra Casino Resort

Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa

7300 N Aliante Pkwy, North Las Vegas, NV 89084, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa is situated on more than 40 pristine acres within the Aliante master-planned community at Aliante Parkway and Interstate 215. The AAA Four Diamond Hotel features more than 200 hotel rooms and suites, five signature restaurants, a 650-seat showroom, more than 100,000 square feet of gaming space, a resort-style pool and a new 3,500-square-foot spa.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 183
Subsidiaries: 25
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
1

Belterra Casino Resort

777 Belterra Dr, Florence, Indiana, US, 47020
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Nestled in the heart of Indiana, Belterra Casino Resort is the every day escape for Indiana, Kentucky and Ohio. Belterra is just a short drive from Cincinnati, Lexington, Louisville and Indianapolis boasting over 600 guest rooms & suites, high-end shopping, concerts, meetings rooms, delicious restaurants and player-friendly gambling Belterra is easily the best experience in the region. Our multi-level casino features over 1,300 slot machines, over 50 table games like Blackjack & Craps and expert dealers. Take some time for yourself too in Beleza, Belterra's premier spa. Experience for yourself, escape to Belterra today! In addition to our award-winning hotel & amenities Belterra Casino Resort is an excellent destination for events and meetings. Boasting over 55,000 square feet of versatile meeting space, an on-site AV team and the best food in the region. We also have an expert team of planners here to help make your event successful and enjoyable for all. To get started planning an event visit belterracasino.com. *Must be 21 years of age to enter the casino. For responsible gaming information please call 1.800.944.8448

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 409
Subsidiaries: 46
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aliante-casino-hotel.jpeg
Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/belterra-casino-resort.jpeg
Belterra Casino Resort
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Belterra Casino Resort
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Belterra Casino Resort in 2025.

Incident History — Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Belterra Casino Resort (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Belterra Casino Resort cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aliante-casino-hotel.jpeg
Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Data Theft, Potential Financial Gain, Fraud/Identity Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/belterra-casino-resort.jpeg
Belterra Casino Resort
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Belterra Casino Resort company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Belterra Casino Resort company has not reported any.

In the current year, Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa company has reported more cyber incidents than Belterra Casino Resort company.

Neither Belterra Casino Resort company nor Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Belterra Casino Resort company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Belterra Casino Resort company nor Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa company nor Belterra Casino Resort company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa nor Belterra Casino Resort holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Belterra Casino Resort company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa company.

Belterra Casino Resort company employs more people globally than Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa nor Belterra Casino Resort holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa nor Belterra Casino Resort holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa nor Belterra Casino Resort holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa nor Belterra Casino Resort holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa nor Belterra Casino Resort holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aliante Casino + Hotel + Spa nor Belterra Casino Resort holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H