Comparison Overview

Alexander & Buono Foundation

VS

Stages Chicago

Alexander & Buono Foundation

undefined, New York, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Ever since its founding, Alexander & Buono International has been committed to creating ways for classical musicians to achieve their career goals. Whether through performance, music education, arts administration, or a vast array of associated professions, our focus remains helping artists establish fulfilling lives in the world of classical music. As we have grown, so have our companies which are designed to facilitate this process. With competitions for Piano, Voice, Strings, and Flute, publications, a music festival, and a foundation offering scholarships and study grants, we are continuing our commitment to helping musicians realize their dreams.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stages Chicago

undefined, Chicago, IL, 60607, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Stages Chicago is an arts education program founded in 2016 that is dedicated to bringing the highest quality, developmentally appropriate performing arts experiences to children and families. Our curriculum is developed by professional performers turned early childhood development professionals who have decades of experience onstage and in the classroom. Stages is proud to offer a variety of inclusive programming for all ages and abilities. From developmentally appropriate music classes for infants (that are also entertaining for adults) to after school programs that serve as a training ground for the next generation of performers, Stages has it all. In 2021, Stages Chicago transitioned to a not-for-profit organization in order to expand our reach and better support our mission of making quality performing arts education experiences accessible for all children and families.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alexander-&-buono-international.jpeg
Alexander & Buono Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stages-performing-arts.jpeg
Stages Chicago
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Alexander & Buono Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stages Chicago
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alexander & Buono Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stages Chicago in 2025.

Incident History — Alexander & Buono Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alexander & Buono Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stages Chicago (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stages Chicago cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alexander-&-buono-international.jpeg
Alexander & Buono Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stages-performing-arts.jpeg
Stages Chicago
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stages Chicago company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Alexander & Buono Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stages Chicago company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Alexander & Buono Foundation company.

In the current year, Stages Chicago company and Alexander & Buono Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stages Chicago company nor Alexander & Buono Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stages Chicago company nor Alexander & Buono Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stages Chicago company nor Alexander & Buono Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Alexander & Buono Foundation company nor Stages Chicago company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Alexander & Buono Foundation nor Stages Chicago holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Alexander & Buono Foundation company nor Stages Chicago company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stages Chicago company employs more people globally than Alexander & Buono Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Alexander & Buono Foundation nor Stages Chicago holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Alexander & Buono Foundation nor Stages Chicago holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Alexander & Buono Foundation nor Stages Chicago holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Alexander & Buono Foundation nor Stages Chicago holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Alexander & Buono Foundation nor Stages Chicago holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Alexander & Buono Foundation nor Stages Chicago holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N