Comparison Overview

Alexander & Buono Foundation

VS

Attack Theatre, Inc.

Alexander & Buono Foundation

undefined, New York, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.alexanderbuono.org/

Ever since its founding, Alexander & Buono International has been committed to creating ways for classical musicians to achieve their career goals. Whether through performance, music education, arts administration, or a vast array of associated professions, our focus remains helping artists establish fulfilling lives in the world of classical music. As we have grown, so have our companies which are designed to facilitate this process. With competitions for Piano, Voice, Strings, and Flute, publications, a music festival, and a foundation offering scholarships and study grants, we are continuing our commitment to helping musicians realize their dreams.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Attack Theatre, Inc.

212 45th St, Pittsburgh, 15201, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.attacktheatre.com

Under the artistic direction of Peter Kope and Michele de la Reza, Attack Theatre has been making personal, accessible and collaborative dance-based performances with "ninja-like intensity"​ (Pittsburgh Tribune Review) for fifteen years. They combine modern dance, original live music, multimedia and interdisciplinary art forms to present work in traditional and nontraditional spaces both nationally and internationally. They have collaborated with major regional theaters (Quantum Theatre), NYC Broadway productions (Squonk), museums (Carnegie Museum of Art, Andy Warhol Museum, Frick Art Museum, Mattress Factory), symphonies (Pittsburgh Symphony Orchestra), operas (Pittsburgh Opera, Opera Theatre of Pittsburgh, Spoleto USA) and international dance companies (Japan's Nibroll Collective, Belgium's Compagnie Matteo Moles), thereby presenting nearly 100 original works in theatrical and site specific settings. While maintaining a loyal audience in Pittsburgh, they have toured nationally in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Maryland, South Carolina, D.C., Texas, Washington, New York and Massachusetts; and internationally, throughout France, Monaco, Germany, Switzerland, Indonesia, Turkey and Japan.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alexander-&-buono-international.jpeg
Alexander & Buono Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/attacktheatre.jpeg
Attack Theatre, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Alexander & Buono Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Attack Theatre, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alexander & Buono Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Attack Theatre, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Alexander & Buono Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alexander & Buono Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Attack Theatre, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Attack Theatre, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alexander-&-buono-international.jpeg
Alexander & Buono Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/attacktheatre.jpeg
Attack Theatre, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Alexander & Buono Foundation company and Attack Theatre, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Attack Theatre, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Alexander & Buono Foundation company.

In the current year, Attack Theatre, Inc. company and Alexander & Buono Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Attack Theatre, Inc. company nor Alexander & Buono Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Attack Theatre, Inc. company nor Alexander & Buono Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Attack Theatre, Inc. company nor Alexander & Buono Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Alexander & Buono Foundation company nor Attack Theatre, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Alexander & Buono Foundation nor Attack Theatre, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Alexander & Buono Foundation company nor Attack Theatre, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Attack Theatre, Inc. company employs more people globally than Alexander & Buono Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Alexander & Buono Foundation nor Attack Theatre, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Alexander & Buono Foundation nor Attack Theatre, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Alexander & Buono Foundation nor Attack Theatre, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Alexander & Buono Foundation nor Attack Theatre, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Alexander & Buono Foundation nor Attack Theatre, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Alexander & Buono Foundation nor Attack Theatre, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References