Comparison Overview

Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd.

VS

robominds GmbH

Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd.

785 Pacific Rd Unit 8, Oakville, Ontario, L6L 6M3, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. (AEJ) was established in 1977 as a sales agency representing world class packaging machinery manufacturers serving the Canadian food and beverage industry including pharmaceutical and personal health care industries. AEJ had experienced steady growth since its inception & today has offices in Oakville Ontario, just outside Toronto, Montreal Quebec and Edmonton Alberta. Acknowledged as a leading source of automation solutions, always committed to meet our customer demand in product, quality, price competitiveness & promptness in delivery. AEJ also provides quality spare parts. Majority of the spare parts supplied are available ready stock at very reasonable price.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

robominds GmbH

Wilhelmine-Reichard Straße 7, Munich, Bavaria, 80935, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Smart Robotics – for everyone. We are passionate about robotics innovations that will move you forward. ‘Making robots smart’ is our vision, mission and everyday business – at the best possible level. We don’t ask “Does it work?” but “How does it work?”. In any case, the answer is: with a powerful, interdisciplinary team. Together we raise robotics to a new level, towards real artificial intelligence and therefore to real automation, realizable and affordable for every size of company.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alex-e-jones-&-associates-ltd..jpeg
Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robominds-gmbh.jpeg
robominds GmbH
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
robominds GmbH
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for robominds GmbH in 2025.

Incident History — Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — robominds GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

robominds GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alex-e-jones-&-associates-ltd..jpeg
Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/robominds-gmbh.jpeg
robominds GmbH
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to robominds GmbH company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, robominds GmbH company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. company.

In the current year, robominds GmbH company and Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither robominds GmbH company nor Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither robominds GmbH company nor Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither robominds GmbH company nor Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. company nor robominds GmbH company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. nor robominds GmbH holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. company nor robominds GmbH company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

robominds GmbH company employs more people globally than Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. nor robominds GmbH holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. nor robominds GmbH holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. nor robominds GmbH holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. nor robominds GmbH holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. nor robominds GmbH holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Alex E Jones & Associates Ltd. nor robominds GmbH holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H