Comparison Overview

ALEC Holdings

VS

Hilti Group

ALEC Holdings

Marina Walk, Dubai, PO Box 27639, AE
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

ALEC Holdings, part of the Investment Corporate of Dubai (ICD), is a leading construction and related businesses group operating in the UAE and KSA. The company builds and provides construction solutions that set industry benchmarks for quality, safety, functionality, and aesthetics. ALEC Holdings offers its clients complete turnkey solutions in construction, MEP, fit-out, marine, oil & gas, modular construction, energy efficiency and solar projects, heavy equipment rental, technology systems, data centers and asset maintenance. With these capabilities, the company successfully serves a diverse range of sectors including airports, retail, hotels & resorts, high-rise buildings, and themed projects.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 10,308
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hilti Group

Hilti Aktiengesellschaft, Schaan, undefined, 9494, LI
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Hilti stands for innovation and direct customer relationships. About 34,000 employees around the world, in more than 120 countries, contribute to making our customers’ work more productive, safer and more sustainable. We do this with our hardware, software and service offering. With roughly 280,000 customer contacts each day, many ideas come directly from our customers. If there is a challenge for which no Hilti solution exists, one will be developed. This is why we invest approximately 6 percent of sales each year in research and development. From product development to manufacturing, logistics, sales and services, we cover the entire value-added chain. We aim to be our customers' best partner for productivity, safety and sustainability. We aim to be the best partner in making construction better. For unique and diverse career opportunities, take a look at our worldwide vacancies at https://careers.hilti.group/en/jobs/.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 27,418
Subsidiaries: 42
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alecholdings.jpeg
ALEC Holdings
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hilti.jpeg
Hilti Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ALEC Holdings
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hilti Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ALEC Holdings in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hilti Group in 2025.

Incident History — ALEC Holdings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ALEC Holdings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hilti Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hilti Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alecholdings.jpeg
ALEC Holdings
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hilti.jpeg
Hilti Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hilti Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ALEC Holdings company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hilti Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ALEC Holdings company.

In the current year, Hilti Group company and ALEC Holdings company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hilti Group company nor ALEC Holdings company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hilti Group company nor ALEC Holdings company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hilti Group company nor ALEC Holdings company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ALEC Holdings company nor Hilti Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Hilti Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Hilti Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ALEC Holdings company.

Hilti Group company employs more people globally than ALEC Holdings company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Hilti Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Hilti Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Hilti Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Hilti Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Hilti Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Hilti Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H