Comparison Overview

ALEC Holdings

VS

Andrade Gutierrez S.A.

ALEC Holdings

Marina Walk, Dubai, PO Box 27639, AE
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

ALEC Holdings, part of the Investment Corporate of Dubai (ICD), is a leading construction and related businesses group operating in the UAE and KSA. The company builds and provides construction solutions that set industry benchmarks for quality, safety, functionality, and aesthetics. ALEC Holdings offers its clients complete turnkey solutions in construction, MEP, fit-out, marine, oil & gas, modular construction, energy efficiency and solar projects, heavy equipment rental, technology systems, data centers and asset maintenance. With these capabilities, the company successfully serves a diverse range of sectors including airports, retail, hotels & resorts, high-rise buildings, and themed projects.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 10,308
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Andrade Gutierrez S.A.

Avª das Nações Unidas 12495, São Paulo, 04578-000, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Fundada em Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, a Andrade Gutierrez tem reconhecida expertise no segmento de construção pesada. Na década de 1990 iniciou a diversificação dos negócios com investimentos nas áreas de Concessões e Telecomunicações. Hoje o Grupo Andrade Gutierrez é um dos maiores conglomerados de infraestrutura na América Latina e acumula projetos realizados em mais de 40 países. Participa como investidora em empresas como Oi e Contax (AG Telecom), CCR, Sanepar, e Cemig (AG Investimentos). AG Jovem: www.agjovem.com.br Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/AndradeGutierrezSA Twitter: https://twitter.com/Grupo_AG Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/AndradeGutierrez

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 11,213
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alecholdings.jpeg
ALEC Holdings
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andrade-gutierrez.jpeg
Andrade Gutierrez S.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ALEC Holdings
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Andrade Gutierrez S.A.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ALEC Holdings in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Andrade Gutierrez S.A. in 2025.

Incident History — ALEC Holdings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ALEC Holdings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Andrade Gutierrez S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Andrade Gutierrez S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alecholdings.jpeg
ALEC Holdings
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andrade-gutierrez.jpeg
Andrade Gutierrez S.A.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ALEC Holdings company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ALEC Holdings company.

In the current year, Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company and ALEC Holdings company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company nor ALEC Holdings company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company nor ALEC Holdings company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company nor ALEC Holdings company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ALEC Holdings company nor Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Andrade Gutierrez S.A. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ALEC Holdings company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company.

Andrade Gutierrez S.A. company employs more people globally than ALEC Holdings company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Andrade Gutierrez S.A. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Andrade Gutierrez S.A. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Andrade Gutierrez S.A. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Andrade Gutierrez S.A. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Andrade Gutierrez S.A. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ALEC Holdings nor Andrade Gutierrez S.A. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H