Comparison Overview

ALE Graphic Design

VS

Menagerie

ALE Graphic Design

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Freelance graphic designer and marketing specialist. Recent projects include design and maintenance of four simple Wordpress sites. Logo designs for not-for-profit and corporate business. Mailchimp/e-mail and Powerpoint templates, as well as misc. print materials including invitations, newsletters, and brochures. I am very focused and responsive when working on projects and finish my work in a timely manner.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Menagerie

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Hello there So, firstly, my name's Andy Doran, my company name is Menagerie and I basically make things on the screen look good and sometimes move around. As a design student I was a Royal Society of Arts Finalist and a member of the Manchester Creative Circle. I had my first taste of the industry at BDH Advertising, worked round a few other design studios and agencies, ran the graphic design department at Telewest and then jumped headfirst into the world of freelance design. Along the way I've built up a direct client list, learnt more things, learnt what not to do, welcomed and embraced the internet, designed, maintained and hosted websites, directed and animated music videos for broadcast, worked as freelancer for Code Computerlove, Love Creative, Iris Nation, The Chase, True North, Creative Lynx, Epigram and others, met lots of good people, composed and recorded soundtracks for animation and video, learnt how to code in actionscript and xhtml, produced motion graphics sequences and 3d scenarios, perfected my tea making abilities...[pause for breath...]

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ale-graphic-design.jpeg
ALE Graphic Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/menagerie.jpeg
Menagerie
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ALE Graphic Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Menagerie
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ALE Graphic Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Menagerie in 2025.

Incident History — ALE Graphic Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ALE Graphic Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Menagerie (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Menagerie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ale-graphic-design.jpeg
ALE Graphic Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/menagerie.jpeg
Menagerie
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Menagerie company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ALE Graphic Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Menagerie company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ALE Graphic Design company.

In the current year, Menagerie company and ALE Graphic Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Menagerie company nor ALE Graphic Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Menagerie company nor ALE Graphic Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Menagerie company nor ALE Graphic Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ALE Graphic Design company nor Menagerie company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ALE Graphic Design nor Menagerie holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ALE Graphic Design company nor Menagerie company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Menagerie company employs more people globally than ALE Graphic Design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither ALE Graphic Design nor Menagerie holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ALE Graphic Design nor Menagerie holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ALE Graphic Design nor Menagerie holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ALE Graphic Design nor Menagerie holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ALE Graphic Design nor Menagerie holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ALE Graphic Design nor Menagerie holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X