Comparison Overview

Alderson Court Reporting

VS

Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC

Alderson Court Reporting

1111 14th Street, NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20036, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

From eDiscovery, Managed Review and Court Reporting (including Concise® Deposition Digesting, video synchronization, and digital video services) to Legal Staffing and Translations, Alderson, the first name in court reporting, now delivers total support for the entire litigation lifecycle. Enjoy 24/7 customer service backed by stringent recruiting standards and the support of the nation's largest privately-held litigation support provider. This is the Power of One.™ Headquartered in Washington, D.C., with offices around the country, Alderson has proudly been serving leading AmLaw firms and corporate counsel, U.S. presidents, and international agencies since 1938. From transcripts for key U.S. Senate committees to our work on the September 11 Victim’s Compensation Fund hearings, Alderson has continually set the standard in court reporting and litigation support solutions. Put the Power of One to work for you by leveraging our leading-edge litigation support solutions. Contact us today for a free consultation.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC

2800 Post Oak Blvd., Houston, TX, 77056, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC has provided the experience and service our clients require for their transactional and litigation needs for more than 35 years. Our practice areas include community associations, labor and employment for business owners and employers, professional liability, directors and officers litigation, fiduciary litigation, commercial litigation, probate and estate planning, elder law, appeals, construction law, corporate matters and real estate transactions. Clients come to us because they trust us to accomplish what we say we will. From the boardroom to the courthouse, the firm’s established experience, commitment to exemplary service and sincere approachability set us apart from other law firms. Our seasoned risk-management philosophy emphasizes litigation avoidance through corporate-compliance efforts and pragmatic business decisions. The firm is A-V rated and listed on Martindale-Hubbell’s list of Preeminent Law Firms. Several of our attorneys have been recognized in their areas of specialization by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC was formed by the merger of two well-established Texas law practices. Butler | Hailey was founded in 1980 and focused its practice on representing community associations, condominium associations, developers and builders. Roberts Markel Weinberg PC was founded in 1981 as a full-service civil law firm handling transactional and litigation matters throughout the state of Texas. With offices in Austin, Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio, the firm includes more than 43 lawyers with diverse practice areas and backgrounds who have the experience, maturity and legal skills to handle a wide range of legal issues. Since our inception, we have provided our clients with practical and efficient solutions to help them grow along with us.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alderson-court-reporting.jpeg
Alderson Court Reporting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roberts-markel.jpeg
Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Alderson Court Reporting
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alderson Court Reporting in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC in 2025.

Incident History — Alderson Court Reporting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alderson Court Reporting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alderson-court-reporting.jpeg
Alderson Court Reporting
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/roberts-markel.jpeg
Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Alderson Court Reporting company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Alderson Court Reporting company.

In the current year, Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC company and Alderson Court Reporting company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC company nor Alderson Court Reporting company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC company nor Alderson Court Reporting company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC company nor Alderson Court Reporting company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Alderson Court Reporting company nor Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Alderson Court Reporting nor Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Alderson Court Reporting company nor Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC company employs more people globally than Alderson Court Reporting company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Alderson Court Reporting nor Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Alderson Court Reporting nor Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Alderson Court Reporting nor Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Alderson Court Reporting nor Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Alderson Court Reporting nor Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Alderson Court Reporting nor Roberts Markel Weinberg Butler Hailey PC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X