Comparison Overview

Alberta Health Services

VS

University of Maryland Medical System

Alberta Health Services

10030 – 107 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, CA, T5J 3E4
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Alberta Health Services (AHS) is proud to be part of Canada’s first and largest provincewide, integrated health system, responsible for delivering health services to more than 4.5 million people living in Alberta, as well as occasionally to some residents of other provinces and territories Our skilled and dedicated professionals, support staff and physicians come from numerous disciplines, from all walks of life, and from all corners of the world. Our mission is to provide a patient-focused, quality health system that is accessible and sustainable for all Albertans. Our five values – compassion, accountability, respect, excellence and safety – are at the heart of everything that we do.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 46,064
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

University of Maryland Medical System

22 S. Greene St, Baltimore, MD, US, 21201
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The University of Maryland Medical System (UMMS) was created in 1984 when the state-owned University Hospital became a private, nonprofit organization. It has evolved into a multi-hospital system with academic, community and specialty service missions reaching every part of the state and beyond. UMMS is a national and regional referral center for trauma, cancer care, neurocare, cardiac care, women's and children's health and physical rehabilitation. It also has one of the world's largest kidney transplant programs, as well as scores of other programs that improve the physical and mental health of thousands of people daily. The hospitals and health systems that comprise UMMS are: University of Maryland Medical Center University of Maryland Medical Center Midtown Campus UM Rehabilitation and Orthopaedic Institute UM Baltimore Washington Medical Center UM Capital Region Health UM Charles Regional Medical Center UM St. Joseph Medical Center UM Upper Chesapeake Health UM Shore Regional Health Mt. Washington Pediatric Hospital UM Community Medical Group

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,262
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alberta-health-services.jpeg
Alberta Health Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ummedicalsystem.jpeg
University of Maryland Medical System
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Alberta Health Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
University of Maryland Medical System
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alberta Health Services in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Maryland Medical System in 2025.

Incident History — Alberta Health Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alberta Health Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — University of Maryland Medical System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Maryland Medical System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alberta-health-services.jpeg
Alberta Health Services
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2021
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Physical Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ummedicalsystem.jpeg
University of Maryland Medical System
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

University of Maryland Medical System company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Alberta Health Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Alberta Health Services company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas University of Maryland Medical System company has not reported any.

In the current year, University of Maryland Medical System company and Alberta Health Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither University of Maryland Medical System company nor Alberta Health Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither University of Maryland Medical System company nor Alberta Health Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither University of Maryland Medical System company nor Alberta Health Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Alberta Health Services company nor University of Maryland Medical System company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Alberta Health Services nor University of Maryland Medical System holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

University of Maryland Medical System company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Alberta Health Services company.

Alberta Health Services company employs more people globally than University of Maryland Medical System company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Alberta Health Services nor University of Maryland Medical System holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Alberta Health Services nor University of Maryland Medical System holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Alberta Health Services nor University of Maryland Medical System holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Alberta Health Services nor University of Maryland Medical System holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Alberta Health Services nor University of Maryland Medical System holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Alberta Health Services nor University of Maryland Medical System holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H