Comparison Overview

Rural Municipalities of Alberta

VS

Renewable Natural Resources Foundation

Rural Municipalities of Alberta

2510 Sparrow Drive, Nisku, Alberta, T9E 8N5, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 700 and 749

The Rural Municipalities of Alberta (RMA) is a progressive, independent association committed to meeting the diverse and changing needs of Alberta’s 69 counties and municipal districts. Since 1909, the RMA has helped rural municipalities achieve strong, effective local government through advocacy and business services. On behalf of our members, our advocacy team works closely with key stakeholders to ensure that provincial and federal decision-makers, industry, and other relevant parties understand and incorporate rural Alberta’s best interests in their policies. We also offer business services to our members, including cooperative procurement programs through the Canoe Procurement Group of Canada and insurance through RMA Insurance.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Renewable Natural Resources Foundation

6010 Executive Blvd - 5th Floor, North Bethesda, 20852, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749

The Renewable Natural Resources Foundation (RNRF) is an I.R.C. §501(c)(3) nonprofit, public policy research organization founded in 1972. It is a consortium of scientific, professional, educational, design and engineering organizations whose primary purpose is to advance science, the application of science, and public education in managing and conserving renewable natural resources. RNRF’s member organizations recognize that sustaining the Earth’s renewable resource base will require a collaborative approach to problem solving by their disciplines and other disciplines representing the biological, physical and social sciences.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alberta-association-of-municipal-districts-and-counties.jpeg
Rural Municipalities of Alberta
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/renewable-natural-resources-foundation.jpeg
Renewable Natural Resources Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rural Municipalities of Alberta
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Renewable Natural Resources Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rural Municipalities of Alberta in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Renewable Natural Resources Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — Rural Municipalities of Alberta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rural Municipalities of Alberta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Renewable Natural Resources Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Renewable Natural Resources Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alberta-association-of-municipal-districts-and-counties.jpeg
Rural Municipalities of Alberta
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/renewable-natural-resources-foundation.jpeg
Renewable Natural Resources Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Renewable Natural Resources Foundation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rural Municipalities of Alberta company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Renewable Natural Resources Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Rural Municipalities of Alberta company.

In the current year, Renewable Natural Resources Foundation company and Rural Municipalities of Alberta company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Renewable Natural Resources Foundation company nor Rural Municipalities of Alberta company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Renewable Natural Resources Foundation company nor Rural Municipalities of Alberta company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Renewable Natural Resources Foundation company nor Rural Municipalities of Alberta company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rural Municipalities of Alberta company nor Renewable Natural Resources Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rural Municipalities of Alberta nor Renewable Natural Resources Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rural Municipalities of Alberta company nor Renewable Natural Resources Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Rural Municipalities of Alberta nor Renewable Natural Resources Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rural Municipalities of Alberta nor Renewable Natural Resources Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rural Municipalities of Alberta nor Renewable Natural Resources Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rural Municipalities of Alberta nor Renewable Natural Resources Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rural Municipalities of Alberta nor Renewable Natural Resources Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rural Municipalities of Alberta nor Renewable Natural Resources Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H