Comparison Overview

Albanian Armed Forces

VS

US Navy

Albanian Armed Forces

Tirana Tirana, 00355, AL
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

The Albanian Armed Forces (AAF) (Albanian: Forcat e Armatosura të Republikës së Shqipërisë (FARSH)) were formed after the declaration of independence in 1912. Today it consists of: the General Staff, the Albanian Land Force, the Albanian Air Force and the Albanian Naval Force. According to the Albanian Constitution, the Albanian Armed Forces are charged to: Protect the territorial integrity of the country. Always be present in areas incurring menace. Assist the population in case of natural and industrial disasters and warn the dangers of military and non military nature. Protect the constitutional order as it is determined by law. Participate in international operations in composition of multinational forces.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

US Navy

1200 Navy Pentagon, Washington, 20350, US
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799

The United States is a maritime nation, and the U.S. Navy protects America at sea. Alongside our allies and partners, we defend freedom, preserve economic prosperity, and keep the seas open and free. Our nation is engaged in long-term competition. To defend American interests around the globe, the U.S. Navy must remain prepared to execute our timeless role, as directed by Congress and the President.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 161,815
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/albanian-armed-forces.jpeg
Albanian Armed Forces
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Albanian Armed Forces
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
US Navy
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Albanian Armed Forces in 2026.

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for US Navy in 2026.

Incident History — Albanian Armed Forces (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Albanian Armed Forces cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — US Navy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Navy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/albanian-armed-forces.jpeg
Albanian Armed Forces
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-navy.jpeg
US Navy
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Disclosure of Information
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

US Navy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Albanian Armed Forces company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

US Navy company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Albanian Armed Forces company has not reported any.

In the current year, US Navy company and Albanian Armed Forces company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither US Navy company nor Albanian Armed Forces company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

US Navy company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Albanian Armed Forces company has not reported such incidents publicly.

US Navy company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Albanian Armed Forces company has not reported such incidents publicly.

US Navy company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Albanian Armed Forces company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Albanian Armed Forces nor US Navy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

US Navy company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Albanian Armed Forces company.

US Navy company employs more people globally than Albanian Armed Forces company, reflecting its scale as a Armed Forces.

Neither Albanian Armed Forces nor US Navy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Albanian Armed Forces nor US Navy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Albanian Armed Forces nor US Navy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Albanian Armed Forces nor US Navy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Albanian Armed Forces nor US Navy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Albanian Armed Forces nor US Navy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H