Comparison Overview

Albanian Armed Forces

VS

Marine Corps Recruiting

Albanian Armed Forces

Tirana Tirana, 00355, AL
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

The Albanian Armed Forces (AAF) (Albanian: Forcat e Armatosura të Republikës së Shqipërisë (FARSH)) were formed after the declaration of independence in 1912. Today it consists of: the General Staff, the Albanian Land Force, the Albanian Air Force and the Albanian Naval Force. According to the Albanian Constitution, the Albanian Armed Forces are charged to: Protect the territorial integrity of the country. Always be present in areas incurring menace. Assist the population in case of natural and industrial disasters and warn the dangers of military and non military nature. Protect the constitutional order as it is determined by law. Participate in international operations in composition of multinational forces.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Marine Corps Recruiting

1, Washington, DC, 20350, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

This is the Official LinkedIn Page of Marine Corps Recruiting. We make Marines. We win our nation's battles. We develop quality citizens. These are the promises the Marine Corps makes to our nation and to our Marines. The core values that guide us, and the leadership skills that enable us, not only make for outstanding Marines, they make for upstanding citizens. Every Marine is an ambassador for our nation and our Corps. From the day Marines earn the title through the rest of their lives, the impeccable standards of the Marine Corps are exemplified in everything they do. Marine Corps Officer candidates are evaluated on leadership, academics and physical training. To become an officer, you must excel at all three. The harder you push yourself, the more you will accomplish. You will be challenged as a leader, and learn that the success of your team is as important as your own. Visit Marines.com/Officer to learn if you have what it takes to lead Marines. For more information, contact a Marine Corps recruiter: http://usmarin.es/WyMVIG

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 41,591
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/albanian-armed-forces.jpeg
Albanian Armed Forces
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-states-marine-corps.jpeg
Marine Corps Recruiting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Albanian Armed Forces
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Marine Corps Recruiting
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Albanian Armed Forces in 2026.

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marine Corps Recruiting in 2026.

Incident History — Albanian Armed Forces (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Albanian Armed Forces cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Marine Corps Recruiting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marine Corps Recruiting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/albanian-armed-forces.jpeg
Albanian Armed Forces
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/united-states-marine-corps.jpeg
Marine Corps Recruiting
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Marine Corps Recruiting company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Albanian Armed Forces company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Marine Corps Recruiting company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Albanian Armed Forces company.

In the current year, Marine Corps Recruiting company and Albanian Armed Forces company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Marine Corps Recruiting company nor Albanian Armed Forces company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Marine Corps Recruiting company nor Albanian Armed Forces company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Marine Corps Recruiting company nor Albanian Armed Forces company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Albanian Armed Forces company nor Marine Corps Recruiting company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Albanian Armed Forces nor Marine Corps Recruiting holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Albanian Armed Forces company nor Marine Corps Recruiting company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Marine Corps Recruiting company employs more people globally than Albanian Armed Forces company, reflecting its scale as a Armed Forces.

Neither Albanian Armed Forces nor Marine Corps Recruiting holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Albanian Armed Forces nor Marine Corps Recruiting holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Albanian Armed Forces nor Marine Corps Recruiting holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Albanian Armed Forces nor Marine Corps Recruiting holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Albanian Armed Forces nor Marine Corps Recruiting holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Albanian Armed Forces nor Marine Corps Recruiting holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N