Comparison Overview

Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated

VS

Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden

Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated

8800 Heritage Center Dr, Anchorage, Alaska 99504, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.alaskanative.net

The Alaska Native Heritage Center (ANHC), one of America's Cultural Treasures, preserves & strengthens the traditions, languages, & art of Alaska’s Native Peoples. An educational and cultural institution for all Alaskans, ANHC provides programs in both academic and informal settings, including workshops, demonstrations, and guided tours of indoor exhibits and outdoor village sites. Our Center provides a unique opportunity to experience Alaska's many diverse Native cultures at one location. In facilitating the transmission of Alaska Native knowledge, heritage and tradition, the Center promotes self-esteem and pride among Alaska Natives. ANHC improves understanding among all Alaskans and encourages appreciation of Alaska Native people and their traditions, history, and contributions to Alaska.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden

10901 Old Cutler Road, Miami, FL, 33156, US
Last Update: 2026-01-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fairchildgarden.org

Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden is a 83 acre botanic garden located in Coral Gables, FL. Fairchild hosts various festivals, concerts and outdoor activities throughout the year. Fairchild is a leading center of palm research, horticulture, and conservation. In 2002, Fairchild launched The Fairchild Challenge - an environmental outreach program designed to promote environmental awareness, scholarship and stewardship in teenagers and pre-teens.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 127
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alaska-native-heritage-center-incorporated.jpeg
Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fairchild-tropical-botanic-garden.jpeg
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden in 2026.

Incident History — Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alaska-native-heritage-center-incorporated.jpeg
Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fairchild-tropical-botanic-garden.jpeg
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated company.

In the current year, Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden company and Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden company nor Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden company nor Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden company nor Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated company nor Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated nor Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated company nor Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden company employs more people globally than Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated nor Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated nor Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated nor Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated nor Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated nor Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Alaska Native Heritage Center, Incorporated nor Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References