Comparison Overview

Alameda

VS

Spinks

Alameda

Praga 14B, Oxford, Ciudad de México, 06600, MX
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

En Alameda, nuestro propósito es crear la mejor experiencia de compra para productos de hogar en Latinoamérica. Para esto, estamos construyendo la plataforma donde nuestros clientes encuentran todo para su hogar, en un solo lugar. Nos enfocamos en facilitar todo el proceso de compra de muebles y artículos de decoración desde el origen hasta la entrega, a través de tecnología. Queremos tener un impacto profundo en la clase media y en los principales proveedores de muebles y decoración en la región. Acércate a nosotros si te apasionan: ✔ Los retos y cambiar el status-quo. ✔ Trabajar en un ambiente emprendedor. ✔ La industria de los muebles y decoración. ✔ La tecnología y su impacto en nuestra vida.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 112
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Spinks

6 Millenium Drive, Leeds, LS11 5BP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Based in Leeds UK we are a sustainable and innovative spring manufacturer, shaping our industry through vision and determination. Constantly adapting and striving for bigger and better things over the years we have invented the MicroCoil, Micro Duo and most recently the glue-free pocket spring. Using natural products sourced locally, the steel to create our amazing springs starts at British Steel, the same steel that is used to create our incredible springs has been used to create airports, train stations and even the Sydney harbour bridge. We use our patented technology to be able to create the thinnest spring on the market. Through our efforts, we are proud winners of five Queen’s Awards for Enterprise - including two in Sustainability. We deliver truly inspirational comfort technology that can be used in a wide variety of products from furniture to sports shoes.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alamedamx.jpeg
Alameda
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harrison-spinks-components-ltd.jpeg
Spinks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Alameda
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Spinks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alameda in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spinks in 2025.

Incident History — Alameda (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alameda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Spinks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spinks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alamedamx.jpeg
Alameda
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harrison-spinks-components-ltd.jpeg
Spinks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Alameda company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Spinks company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Spinks company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Alameda company.

In the current year, Spinks company and Alameda company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Spinks company nor Alameda company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Spinks company nor Alameda company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Spinks company nor Alameda company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Alameda company nor Spinks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Alameda nor Spinks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Alameda company nor Spinks company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Alameda company employs more people globally than Spinks company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Alameda nor Spinks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Alameda nor Spinks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Alameda nor Spinks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Alameda nor Spinks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Alameda nor Spinks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Alameda nor Spinks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.