Comparison Overview

Alabama Reflector

VS

Good Authority (formerly TMC)

Alabama Reflector

Montgomery, Alabama, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21

The Alabama Reflector is an independent nonprofit website covering politics and policy in our state. We look at the problems affecting Alabamians, and search for solutions. We connect readers with the decisions made in the hallways of the State House and try to give a voice to those outside it. We write stories about people in power and men and women on the margins. We hope to reflect what our home is, and what it could be.

NAICS: 5191311
NAICS Definition: Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Good Authority (formerly TMC)

2115 G St NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20052, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to Good Authority, a blog that brings insights from political science to a broader audience, brought to you by the team that produced TMC at the Washington Post. Come visit our free, independent website, and discuss, comment, engage, and sign up for our newsletter! Our political scientists draw on their expertise and the discipline’s research to provide in-depth analysis, illuminate the news, and civic discussion. We want the political conversation to include timely, accessible, and sound knowledge from a publicly oriented political science discipline, and to be less dominated by evidence-free arguments.

NAICS: 5191311
NAICS Definition: Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alabama-reflector.jpeg
Alabama Reflector
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-monkey-cage.jpeg
Good Authority (formerly TMC)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Alabama Reflector
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Good Authority (formerly TMC)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Internet News Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alabama Reflector in 2026.

Incidents vs Internet News Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Good Authority (formerly TMC) in 2026.

Incident History — Alabama Reflector (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alabama Reflector cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Good Authority (formerly TMC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Good Authority (formerly TMC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alabama-reflector.jpeg
Alabama Reflector
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-monkey-cage.jpeg
Good Authority (formerly TMC)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Alabama Reflector company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Good Authority (formerly TMC) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Good Authority (formerly TMC) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Alabama Reflector company.

In the current year, Good Authority (formerly TMC) company and Alabama Reflector company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Good Authority (formerly TMC) company nor Alabama Reflector company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Good Authority (formerly TMC) company nor Alabama Reflector company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Good Authority (formerly TMC) company nor Alabama Reflector company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Alabama Reflector company nor Good Authority (formerly TMC) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Alabama Reflector nor Good Authority (formerly TMC) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Alabama Reflector company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Good Authority (formerly TMC) company.

Good Authority (formerly TMC) company employs more people globally than Alabama Reflector company, reflecting its scale as a Internet News.

Neither Alabama Reflector nor Good Authority (formerly TMC) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Alabama Reflector nor Good Authority (formerly TMC) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Alabama Reflector nor Good Authority (formerly TMC) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Alabama Reflector nor Good Authority (formerly TMC) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Alabama Reflector nor Good Authority (formerly TMC) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Alabama Reflector nor Good Authority (formerly TMC) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.