Comparison Overview

Alabama Graphics

VS

Nimax

Alabama Graphics

2801 5th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35233, US
Last Update: 2025-12-19
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.algraphics.com

As one of the state’s preferred digital printers and document management providers, Alabama Graphics strives to be your one-stop shop for all your printing, signage and document management needs. Equipped with the latest technology, our team is committed to providing customers with high-quality printing solutions as well as a loyal support network of seasoned professionals.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 43
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Nimax

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nimax.nl

Printing company of specialist flexible packaging, located in the east of Nederland in Elst Gld. Nimax has small web flexo and rotogravure presses with additional features like embossing, slitting, die cutting. We serve the tobacco market with innerliners, the tea market with a variaty of tags and envelopes and produce bands for the embroidery yarn industry. Supply world wide.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alabama-graphics.jpeg
Alabama Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Nimax
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Alabama Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nimax
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alabama Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nimax in 2025.

Incident History — Alabama Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alabama Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nimax (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nimax cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alabama-graphics.jpeg
Alabama Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Nimax
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nimax company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Alabama Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nimax company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Alabama Graphics company.

In the current year, Nimax company and Alabama Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nimax company nor Alabama Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nimax company nor Alabama Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nimax company nor Alabama Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Alabama Graphics company nor Nimax company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Alabama Graphics nor Nimax holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Alabama Graphics company nor Nimax company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Alabama Graphics company employs more people globally than Nimax company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Alabama Graphics nor Nimax holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Alabama Graphics nor Nimax holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Alabama Graphics nor Nimax holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Alabama Graphics nor Nimax holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Alabama Graphics nor Nimax holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Alabama Graphics nor Nimax holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Authorization (CWE-285) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation (CAPEC-233) by allowing an authenticated user to bypass intended permission restrictions via a crafted HTTP request. This allows an attacker who lacks the live queries - read permission to successfully retrieve the list of live queries.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15.1, it was possible to overwrite Git configuration remotely and override some of its behavior. Version 5.15.1 fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with snapshot restore privileges to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and a denial of service (DoS) via crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (CWE-79) allows an unauthenticated user to embed a malicious script in content that will be served to web browsers causing cross-site scripting (XSS) (CAPEC-63) via a vulnerability a function handler in the Vega AST evaluator.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References