Comparison Overview

Al Rounds Studio

VS

Institut français du Royaume-Uni

Al Rounds Studio

undefined, South Jordan, Utah, 84095, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.alrounds.com

Al Rounds' transparent watercolors register a beautiful familiarity with the world we all love. They carry us over a distance of miles and years, which speak of history revisited and of lives well-lived. Scouring back roads and country lanes, searching for the past, Al Rounds continues to capture a particular reverence for the pride of a place. Travel provides an ongoing source of inspiration for Al. Some of his favorite findings are in upstate New York, with its rural integrity and four-season beauty; in England, with its meandering, damp, cobblestone streets; and in his native Utah, where pioneer history still crowds the fence lines and farmsteads of every town.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Institut français du Royaume-Uni

17 Queensberry Place, London, undefined, SW7 2DT, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.institut-francais.org.uk/

Founded in 1910, the Institut français du Royaume-Uni exists to promote French language and culture and to encourage cross-cultural exchange. Comprising a language centre, a cinema (Ciné Lumière), a multi-media library (La Médiathèque) a children's library (Bibliothèque Quentin Blake) and a cafe-restaurant, it offers a wide range of events and activities, from film screenings and festivals to concerts and talks and welcomes thousands of people each year. The Institut also collaborates with schools in the UK on educational cooperation programmes to promote French language learning. In addition, it presents and supports external events, in collaboration with British partners, particularly in the visual and performing arts and develops Franco-British academic cooperation projects.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/al-rounds-studio.jpeg
Al Rounds Studio
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ifru.jpeg
Institut français du Royaume-Uni
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Al Rounds Studio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Institut français du Royaume-Uni
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Al Rounds Studio in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institut français du Royaume-Uni in 2026.

Incident History — Al Rounds Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Al Rounds Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Institut français du Royaume-Uni (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institut français du Royaume-Uni cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/al-rounds-studio.jpeg
Al Rounds Studio
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ifru.jpeg
Institut français du Royaume-Uni
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Al Rounds Studio company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Institut français du Royaume-Uni company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Institut français du Royaume-Uni company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Al Rounds Studio company.

In the current year, Institut français du Royaume-Uni company and Al Rounds Studio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Institut français du Royaume-Uni company nor Al Rounds Studio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Institut français du Royaume-Uni company nor Al Rounds Studio company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Institut français du Royaume-Uni company nor Al Rounds Studio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Al Rounds Studio company nor Institut français du Royaume-Uni company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Al Rounds Studio nor Institut français du Royaume-Uni holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Al Rounds Studio company nor Institut français du Royaume-Uni company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Institut français du Royaume-Uni company employs more people globally than Al Rounds Studio company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Al Rounds Studio nor Institut français du Royaume-Uni holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Al Rounds Studio nor Institut français du Royaume-Uni holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Al Rounds Studio nor Institut français du Royaume-Uni holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Al Rounds Studio nor Institut français du Royaume-Uni holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Al Rounds Studio nor Institut français du Royaume-Uni holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Al Rounds Studio nor Institut français du Royaume-Uni holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References